These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27082781)

  • 1. Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy in Imaging Journals: Analysis of Pooling Techniques and Their Effect on Summary Estimates of Diagnostic Accuracy.
    McGrath TA; McInnes MD; Korevaar DA; Bossuyt PM
    Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 27082781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of simple pooling and bivariate model used in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy published in Chinese journals].
    Huang YS; Yang ZR; Zhan SY
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Jun; 47(3):483-8. PubMed ID: 26080880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are Study and Journal Characteristics Reliable Indicators of "Truth" in Imaging Research?
    Frank RA; McInnes MDF; Levine D; Kressel HY; Jesurum JS; Petrcich W; McGrath TA; Bossuyt PM
    Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):215-223. PubMed ID: 29173122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survey revealed a lack of clarity about recommended methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy data.
    Ochodo EA; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Leeflang MM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1281-8. PubMed ID: 23998917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Dinnes J; Deeks J; Kirby J; Roderick P
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(12):1-113, iii. PubMed ID: 15774235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Citation bias in imaging research: are studies with higher diagnostic accuracy estimates cited more often?
    Frank RA; Sharifabadi AD; Salameh JP; McGrath TA; Kraaijpoel N; Dang W; Li N; Gauthier ID; Wu MZ; Bossuyt PM; Levine D; McInnes MDF
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1657-1664. PubMed ID: 30443756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
    Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Leeflang MM; Deeks JJ; Gatsonis C; Bossuyt PM;
    Ann Intern Med; 2008 Dec; 149(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 19075208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary.
    Harbord RM; Whiting P; Sterne JA; Egger M; Deeks JJ; Shang A; Bachmann LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19208372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of Presurgical Functional MR Imaging for Language Mapping of Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Weng HH; Noll KR; Johnson JM; Prabhu SS; Tsai YH; Chang SW; Huang YC; Lee JD; Yang JT; Yang CT; Tsai YH; Yang CY; Hazle JD; Schomer DF; Liu HL
    Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):512-523. PubMed ID: 28980887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-epidemiologic study showed frequent time trends in summary estimates from meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Cohen JF; Korevaar DA; Wang J; Leeflang MM; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 77():60-67. PubMed ID: 27212137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of univariate and bivariate models in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Foxlee N; Stone JC; Doi SA
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Mar; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 25734862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mixture models in diagnostic meta-analyses--clustering summary receiver operating characteristic curves accounted for heterogeneity and correlation.
    Schlattmann P; Verba M; Dewey M; Walther M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 25441701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Leeflang MM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 24274632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews.
    van Enst WA; Scholten RJ; Whiting P; Zwinderman AH; Hooft L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):1192-9. PubMed ID: 24996667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An exemplary reanalysis of coronary computed tomography angiography diagnostic meta-analyses shows insufficient data sharing and incorrect sensitivity and specificity estimates.
    Vogelgesang F; Coenen MH; Schueler S; Schlattmann P; Dewey M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 170():111306. PubMed ID: 38428541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data.
    Zamora J; Abraira V; Muriel A; Khan K; Coomarasamy A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jul; 6():31. PubMed ID: 16836745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Critical reading of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about diagnostic imaging].
    Plana MN; Zamora J; Abraira V
    Radiologia; 2015 Nov; 57 Suppl 2():23-30. PubMed ID: 26071664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.