These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27082781)

  • 21. Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of "spin".
    Ochodo EA; de Haan MC; Reitsma JB; Hooft L; Bossuyt PM; Leeflang MM
    Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):581-8. PubMed ID: 23360738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Univariate and bivariate likelihood-based meta-analysis methods performed comparably when marginal sensitivity and specificity were the targets of inference.
    Dahabreh IJ; Trikalinos TA; Lau J; Schmid CH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():8-17. PubMed ID: 28063915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Heterogeneity assessment in gastroenterology systematic reviews: an analysis of current practices.
    Heavener T; Richards J; Bird H; Vassar M
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16(2):101-106. PubMed ID: 29176428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bivariate meta-analysis of predictive values of diagnostic tests can be an alternative to bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity.
    Leeflang MM; Deeks JJ; Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 65(10):1088-97. PubMed ID: 22742916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity: summary of quantitative findings in 50 meta-analyses.
    Menke J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):844-52. PubMed ID: 24828853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies in mental health.
    Takwoingi Y; Riley RD; Deeks JJ
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2015 Nov; 18(4):103-9. PubMed ID: 26446042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Time to publication among completed diagnostic accuracy studies: associated with reported accuracy estimates.
    Korevaar DA; van Es N; Zwinderman AH; Cohen JF; Bossuyt PM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():68. PubMed ID: 27267602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Meta-DiSc 2.0: a web application for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.
    Plana MN; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Fernández-García S; Soto J; Fabregate M; Pérez T; Roqué M; Zamora J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):306. PubMed ID: 36443653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Association between compliance with methodological standards of diagnostic research and reported test accuracy: meta-analysis of focused assessment of US for trauma.
    Stengel D; Bauwens K; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Ekkernkamp A
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 15983072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pitfalls of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Imaging Research.
    McInnes MD; Bossuyt PM
    Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 26402491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Diagnostic Value of MR Imaging in Determining the Lymph Node Status of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
    Peerlings J; Troost EG; Nelemans PJ; Cobben DC; de Boer JC; Hoffmann AL; Beets-Tan RG
    Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):86-98. PubMed ID: 27110732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differences between univariate and bivariate models for summarizing diagnostic accuracy may not be large.
    Simel DL; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1292-300. PubMed ID: 19447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.