These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Was Sir William Crookes epistemically virtuous? Kidd IJ Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2014 Dec; 48 Pt A():67-74. PubMed ID: 25091260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of two models of scientific progress. De Langhe R Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2014 Jun; 46():94-9. PubMed ID: 25051877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What concept analysis in philosophy of science should be (and why competing philosophical analyses of gene concepts cannot be tested by polling scientists). Waters CK Hist Philos Life Sci; 2004; 26(1):29-58. PubMed ID: 15791805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value-entanglement and the integrity of scientific research. Resnik DB; Elliott KC Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2019 Jun; 75():1-11. PubMed ID: 31426942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science. Boon M; Van Baalen S Eur J Philos Sci; 2019; 9(1):16. PubMed ID: 30873248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions between sociology and epistemology. Kvasz L Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2014 Jun; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 25051875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific progress without increasing verisimilitude: In response to Niiniluoto. Rowbottom DP Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2015 Jun; 51():100-4. PubMed ID: 26227237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding and scientific progress: lessons from epistemology. Emmerson N Synthese; 2022; 200(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 35194258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Values, standpoints, and scientific/intellectual movements. Rolin K Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2016 Apr; 56():11-9. PubMed ID: 27083080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]