401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27083790)
1. Characterisation of films and nanopaper obtained from cellulose synthesised by acetic acid bacteria.
Rozenberga L; Skute M; Belkova L; Sable I; Vikele L; Semjonovs P; Saka M; Ruklisha M; Paegle L
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Jun; 144():33-40. PubMed ID: 27083790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Komagataeibacter rhaeticus as an alternative bacteria for cellulose production.
Machado RTA; Gutierrez J; Tercjak A; Trovatti E; Uahib FGM; Moreno GP; Nascimento AP; Berreta AA; Ribeiro SJL; Barud HS
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Nov; 152():841-849. PubMed ID: 27516336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistical optimization and characterization of a biocellulose produced by local Egyptian isolate Komagataeibacter hansenii AS.5.
Saleh AK; Soliman NA; Farrag AA; Ibrahim MM; El-Shinnawy NA; Abdel-Fattah YR
Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Feb; 144():198-207. PubMed ID: 31843613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Production of nano bacterial cellulose from beverage industrial waste of citrus peel and pomace using Komagataeibacter xylinus.
Fan X; Gao Y; He W; Hu H; Tian M; Wang K; Pan S
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Oct; 151():1068-1072. PubMed ID: 27474656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cellulose synthesis by Komagataeibacter rhaeticus strain P 1463 isolated from Kombucha.
Semjonovs P; Ruklisha M; Paegle L; Saka M; Treimane R; Skute M; Rozenberga L; Vikele L; Sabovics M; Cleenwerck I
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Feb; 101(3):1003-1012. PubMed ID: 27678116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fruit peels support higher yield and superior quality bacterial cellulose production.
Kumbhar JV; Rajwade JM; Paknikar KM
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Aug; 99(16):6677-91. PubMed ID: 25957154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Production of high crystallinity type-I cellulose from Komagataeibacter hansenii JR-02 isolated from Kombucha tea.
Li J; Chen G; Zhang R; Wu H; Zeng W; Liang Z
Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2019 Jan; 66(1):108-118. PubMed ID: 30359481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of alternative energy sources on bacterial cellulose characteristics produced by Komagataeibacter medellinensis.
Molina-Ramírez C; Enciso C; Torres-Taborda M; Zuluaga R; Gañán P; Rojas OJ; Castro C
Int J Biol Macromol; 2018 Oct; 117():735-741. PubMed ID: 29847783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ecofriendly green biosynthesis and characterization of novel bacteriocin-loaded bacterial cellulose nanofiber from Gluconobacter cerinus HDX-1.
Du R; Ping W; Song G; Ge J
Int J Biol Macromol; 2021 Dec; 193(Pt A):693-701. PubMed ID: 34737079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of pH Buffer and Carbon Metabolism on the Yield and Mechanical Properties of Bacterial Cellulose Produced by
Li Z; Chen SQ; Cao X; Li L; Zhu J; Yu H
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):429-438. PubMed ID: 33323677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Isolation and identification of cellulose-producing strain Komagataeibacter intermedius from fermented fruit juice.
Lin SP; Huang YH; Hsu KD; Lai YJ; Chen YK; Cheng KC
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Oct; 151():827-833. PubMed ID: 27474630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bacterial cellulose production by a strain of Komagataeibacter rhaeticus isolated from residual loquat.
Ye J; Li J; Wang Q; Wang X; Wang S; Wang H; Xu J
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2023 Mar; 107(5-6):1551-1562. PubMed ID: 36723702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laccase-assisted grafting of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) onto the bacterial cellulose as backbone polymer: development and characterisation.
Iqbal HM; Kyazze G; Tron T; Keshavarz T
Carbohydr Polym; 2014 Nov; 113():131-7. PubMed ID: 25256467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Novel bacterial cellulose membrane biosynthesized by a new and highly efficient producer Komagataeibacter rhaeticus TJPU03.
He X; Meng H; Song H; Deng S; He T; Wang S; Wei D; Zhang Z
Carbohydr Res; 2020 Jul; 493():108030. PubMed ID: 32442702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased production of bacterial cellulose as starting point for scaled-up applications.
Gullo M; Sola A; Zanichelli G; Montorsi M; Messori M; Giudici P
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 101(22):8115-8127. PubMed ID: 28965208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Production of bacterial cellulose from Komagataeibacter saccharivorans strain BC1 isolated from rotten green grapes.
Gopu G; Govindan S
Prep Biochem Biotechnol; 2018; 48(9):842-852. PubMed ID: 30303756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril film from nano-structured bacterial cellulose derived from the recently developed thermotolerant Komagataeibacter xylinus C30 and Komagataeibacter oboediens R37-9 strains.
Chitbanyong K; Pisutpiched S; Khantayanuwong S; Theeragool G; Puangsin B
Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Nov; 163():1908-1914. PubMed ID: 32976905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Knockdown of motility-related genes of
Liu J; Wang X; Peng Z; Xin B; Zhong C
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2024 Jun; 40(6):1856-1867. PubMed ID: 38914496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bacterial cellulose production by Komagataeibacter hansenii using algae-based glucose.
Uzyol HK; Saçan MT
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Apr; 24(12):11154-11162. PubMed ID: 27312900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct conversion of raw wood to TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers.
Kaffashsaie E; Yousefi H; Nishino T; Matsumoto T; Mashkour M; Madhoushi M; Kawaguchi H
Carbohydr Polym; 2021 Jun; 262():117938. PubMed ID: 33838815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
