These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27084547)

  • 1. Interdependent effects of cohesion and concurrency for epidemic potential.
    Moody J; Benton RA
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 27084547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrency measures in the era of temporal network epidemiology: a review.
    Masuda N; Miller JC; Holme P
    J R Soc Interface; 2021 Jun; 18(179):20210019. PubMed ID: 34062106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measures of concurrency in networks and the spread of infectious disease.
    Kretzschmar M; Morris M
    Math Biosci; 1996 Apr; 133(2):165-95. PubMed ID: 8718707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrency of partnerships, consistency with data, and control of sexually transmitted infections.
    Leng T; Keeling MJ
    Epidemics; 2018 Dec; 25():35-46. PubMed ID: 29798812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement in reported sexual partnership dates and implications for measuring concurrency.
    Brewer DD; Rothenberg RB; Muth SQ; Roberts JM; Potterat JJ
    Sex Transm Dis; 2006 May; 33(5):277-83. PubMed ID: 16641820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The dynamics of sexual contact networks: effects on disease spread and control.
    Robinson K; Cohen T; Colijn C
    Theor Popul Biol; 2012 Mar; 81(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 22248701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Size matters: concurrency and the epidemic potential of HIV in small networks.
    Carnegie NB; Morris M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e43048. PubMed ID: 22937011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis and simulation of a stochastic, discrete-individual model of STD transmission with partnership concurrency.
    Chick SE; Adams AL; Koopman JS
    Math Biosci; 2000 Jul; 166(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 10882799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of a new web-based sexual concurrency measurement tool for men who have sex with men.
    Rosenberg ES; Rothenberg RB; Kleinbaum DG; Stephenson RB; Sullivan PS
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Nov; 16(11):e246. PubMed ID: 25386801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concurrent sexual partnerships and sexually transmitted diseases in Russia.
    Zhan W; Krasnoselskikh TV; Niccolai LM; Golovanov S; Kozlov AP; Abdala N
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jun; 38(6):543-7. PubMed ID: 21258270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concurrency can drive an HIV epidemic by moving R0 across the epidemic threshold.
    Leung KY; Kretzschmar M
    AIDS; 2015 Jun; 29(9):1097-103. PubMed ID: 25870987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concurrency-Induced Transitions in Epidemic Dynamics on Temporal Networks.
    Onaga T; Gleeson JP; Masuda N
    Phys Rev Lett; 2017 Sep; 119(10):108301. PubMed ID: 28949155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in concurrent sexual partnerships and sexually transmitted diseases among African men in Cape Town, South Africa.
    Maughan-Brown B
    Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Jul; 39(7):537-42. PubMed ID: 22706216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of Timing of Sexual Partnerships and Perceptions of Partners' Concurrency With Reporting of Sexually Transmitted Infection Diagnosis.
    Mercer CH; Jones KG; Geary RS; Field N; Tanton C; Burkill S; Clifton S; Sonnenberg P; Mitchell KR; Gravningen K; Johnson AM
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Dec; 1(8):e185957. PubMed ID: 30646299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Large-network concepts and small-network characteristics: fixed and variable factors.
    Rothenberg R; Muth SQ
    Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Aug; 34(8):604-12. PubMed ID: 17325619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring sex partner concurrency: it's what's missing that counts.
    Nelson SJ; Manhart LE; Gorbach PM; Martin DH; Stoner BP; Aral SO; Holmes KK
    Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Oct; 34(10):801-7. PubMed ID: 17551413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual networks: implications for the transmission of sexually transmitted infections.
    Liljeros F; Edling CR; Nunes Amaral LA
    Microbes Infect; 2003 Feb; 5(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 12650777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association of perceived partner non-monogamy with prevalent and incident sexual concurrency.
    Sanchez DM; Schoenbach VJ; Harvey SM; Warren JT; Adimora AA; Poole C; Leone PA; Agnew CR
    Sex Transm Infect; 2016 Jun; 92(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 26574570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do people really know their sex partners? Concurrency, knowledge of partner behavior, and sexually transmitted infections within partnerships.
    Drumright LN; Gorbach PM; Holmes KK
    Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Jul; 31(7):437-42. PubMed ID: 15215701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of combination packages for HIV-1 prevention in sub-Saharan Africa depends on partnership network structure: a mathematical modelling study.
    Jenness SM; Goodreau SM; Morris M; Cassels S
    Sex Transm Infect; 2016 Dec; 92(8):619-624. PubMed ID: 27288415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.