501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27084572)
1. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.
Proietti S; Dragos L; Molina W; Doizi S; Giusti G; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2016 Jun; 30(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 27084572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which Flexible Ureteroscopes (Digital vs. Fiber-Optic) Can Easily Reach the Difficult Lower Pole Calices and Have Better End-Tip Deflection: In Vitro Study on K-Box. A PETRA Evaluation.
Dragos LB; Somani BK; Sener ET; Buttice S; Proietti S; Ploumidis A; Iacoboaie CT; Doizi S; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2017 Jul; 31(7):630-637. PubMed ID: 28478744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impressive Performance: New Disposable Digital Ureteroscope Allows for Extreme Lower Pole Access and Use of 365 μm Holmium Laser Fiber.
Leveillee RJ; Kelly EF
J Endourol Case Rep; 2016; 2(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 27579436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
Dale J; Kaplan AG; Radvak D; Shin R; Ackerman A; Chen T; Scales CD; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 27981862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes.
Usawachintachit M; Isaacson DS; Taguchi K; Tzou DT; Hsi RS; Sherer BA; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 28287823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of Single-Use FlexorVue vs Reusable BoaVision Ureteroscope for Visualization of Calices and Stone Extraction in an Artificial Kidney Model.
Schlager D; Hein S; Obaid MA; Wilhelm K; Miernik A; Schoenthaler M
J Endourol; 2017 Nov; 31(11):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 28844156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In Vitro Evaluation of Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Practical Comparison for a Patient-Centered Approach.
Marchini GS; Batagello CA; Monga M; Torricelli FCM; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):184-191. PubMed ID: 29239229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Do They Compare with Reusable Ureteroscopes?
Scotland KB; Chan JYH; Chew BH
J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):71-78. PubMed ID: 30612446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.
Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R
Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The "Body Mass Index" of Flexible Ureteroscopes.
Proietti S; Somani B; Sofer M; Pietropaolo A; Rosso M; Saitta G; Gaboardi F; Traxer O; Giusti G
J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1090-1095. PubMed ID: 28835120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Next-Generation Single-Use Ureteroscopes: An In Vitro Comparison.
Tom WR; Wollin DA; Jiang R; Radvak D; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 28978227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Single-Center Prospective Comparative Study of Two Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: LithoVue (Boston Scientific, USA) and Uscope PU3022a (Zhuhai Pusen, China).
Patil A; Agrawal S; Singh A; Ganpule A; Sabnis R; Desai M
J Endourol; 2021 Mar; 35(3):274-278. PubMed ID: 32967450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.
Kramolowsky E; McDowell Z; Moore B; Booth B; Wood N
J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 26542761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Avoiding a Lemon: Performance Consistency of Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
Winship B; Wollin D; Carlos E; Li J; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):127-131. PubMed ID: 30612445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current Disposable Ureteroscopes: Performance and Limitations in a Standardized Kidney Model.
Schlager D; Obaid MA; Hein S; Wilhelm K; Schönthaler M; Gratzke C; Miernik A; Schoeb DS
J Endourol; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 32475165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bare naked baskets: ureteroscope deflection and flow characteristics with intact and disassembled ureteroscopic nitinol stone baskets.
Landman J; Monga M; El-Gabry EA; Rehman J; Lee DI; Bhayani S; Sundaram CP; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2377-9. PubMed ID: 11992041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. WiScope® single use digital flexible ureteroscope versus reusable flexible ureteroscope for management of renal stones: a prospective randomized study.
Ali AI; Eldakhakhny A; Abdelfadel A; Rohiem MF; Elbadry M; Hassan A
World J Urol; 2022 Sep; 40(9):2323-2330. PubMed ID: 35895116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
