These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

35 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27085424)

  • 1. Monofrequency electrical impedance mammography (EIM) diagnostic system in breast cancer screening.
    Murillo-Ortiz B; Hernández-Ramírez A; Rivera-Villanueva T; Suárez-García D; Murguía-Pérez M; Martínez-Garza S; Rodríguez-Penin A; Romero-Coripuna R; López-Partida XM
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):876. PubMed ID: 32928153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of performance metrics in breast screening imaging - where are we and where should we be?
    Cohen SL; Blanks RG; Jenkins J; Kearins O
    Clin Radiol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):381-388. PubMed ID: 29395223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity and specificity of mammographic screening as practised in Vermont and Norway.
    Hofvind S; Geller BM; Skelly J; Vacek PM
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 85(1020):e1226-32. PubMed ID: 22993383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Obesity and mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Maruthur NM; Bolen S; Brancati FL; Clark JM
    J Gen Intern Med; 2009 May; 24(5):665-77. PubMed ID: 19277790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography in Dense and Nondense Breasts.
    Rafferty EA; Durand MA; Conant EF; Copit DS; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Miller DP
    JAMA; 2016 Apr; 315(16):1784-6. PubMed ID: 27115381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intensive breast screening in BRCA2 mutation carriers is associated with reduced breast cancer specific and all cause mortality.
    Evans DG; Harkness EF; Howell A; Wilson M; Hurley E; Holmen MM; Tharmaratnam KU; Hagen AI; Lim Y; Maxwell AJ; Moller P
    Hered Cancer Clin Pract; 2016; 14():8. PubMed ID: 27087880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association Between Body Mass Index and Cancer Screening Adherence Among Latinas in the United States and Puerto Rico.
    Castaneda-Avila MA; Baek J; Epstein MM; Forrester SN; Ortiz AP; Lapane KL
    Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle); 2022; 3(1):552-562. PubMed ID: 37096019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association Between Obesity and Clinicopathological Profile of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer in Saudi Arabia.
    Alshamsan B; Suleman K; Agha N; Abdelgawad MI; Alzahrani MJ; Elhassan T; Al-Tweigeri T; Ajarim D; Alsayed A
    Int J Womens Health; 2022; 14():373-384. PubMed ID: 35309953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diabetes, Obesity, and Inflammation: Impact on Clinical and Radiographic Features of Breast Cancer.
    Miller B; Chalfant H; Thomas A; Wellberg E; Henson C; McNally MW; Grizzle WE; Jain A; McNally LR
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Mar; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33803201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between body mass index and malignancy rates of MRI-guided breast biopsies: impact of clinicodemographic factors.
    Tang A; Cohan CM; Hansen KS; Beattie G; Greenwood HI; Mukhtar RA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Aug; 188(3):739-747. PubMed ID: 33772708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of body mass index on breast cancer incidence among women at increased risk: an observational study from the International Breast Intervention Studies.
    Smith SG; Sestak I; Morris MA; Harvie M; Howell A; Forbes J; Cuzick J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jul; 188(1):215-223. PubMed ID: 33656637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology Alone.
    Ekpo EU; Alakhras M; Brennan P
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 29479948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Synergy in combining findings from mammography and ultrasonography in detecting malignancy in women with higher density breasts and lesions over 2 cm in Albania.
    Malaj A; Shahini A
    Contemp Oncol (Pozn); 2016; 20(6):475-480. PubMed ID: 28239286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Body weight and sensitivity of screening mammography.
    Njor SH; von Euler-Chelpin M; Tjønneland A; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Jun; 60():93-100. PubMed ID: 27085424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Balancing sensitivity and specificity: sixteen year's of experience from the mammography screening programme in Copenhagen, Denmark.
    Utzon-Frank N; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M; Lynge E
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 35(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 21239242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study.
    Hellmann SS; Njor SH; Lynge E; von Euler-Chelpin M; Olsen A; Tjønneland A; Vejborg I; Andersen ZJ
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():294. PubMed ID: 25880028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
    White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cancer screening.
    Milbrath JR; Moskowitz M; Bauermeister D
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1981; 16(3):181-218. PubMed ID: 6268356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.