These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27085523)

  • 41. Impact of mixed Torulaspora delbrueckii-Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on high-sugar fermentation.
    Bely M; Stoeckle P; Masneuf-Pomarède I; Dubourdieu D
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 122(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 18262301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Copy Number Variation in Fungi and Its Implications for Wine Yeast Genetic Diversity and Adaptation.
    Steenwyk JL; Rokas A
    Front Microbiol; 2018; 9():288. PubMed ID: 29520259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Modification of the TRX2 gene dose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae affects hexokinase 2 gene regulation during wine yeast biomass production.
    Gómez-Pastor R; Pérez-Torrado R; Matallana E
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 May; 94(3):773-87. PubMed ID: 22223102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of GPD1 overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae commercial wine yeast strains lacking ALD6 genes.
    Cambon B; Monteil V; Remize F; Camarasa C; Dequin S
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 72(7):4688-94. PubMed ID: 16820460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of wine fermentation temperature on the synthesis of yeast-derived volatile aroma compounds.
    Molina AM; Swiegers JH; Varela C; Pretorius IS; Agosin E
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 77(3):675-87. PubMed ID: 17938912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of scale on gene expression: commercial versus laboratory wine fermentations.
    Rossouw D; Jolly N; Jacobson D; Bauer FF
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Feb; 93(3):1207-19. PubMed ID: 21931974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Deciphering regulatory variation of THI genes in alcoholic fermentation indicate an impact of Thi3p on PDC1 expression.
    Brion C; Ambroset C; Delobel P; Sanchez I; Blondin B
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):1085. PubMed ID: 25494835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Monitoring of Saccharomyces and Hanseniaspora populations during alcoholic fermentation by real-time quantitative PCR.
    Hierro N; Esteve-Zarzoso B; Mas A; Guillamón JM
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2007 Dec; 7(8):1340-9. PubMed ID: 17727658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Stuck at work? Quantitative proteomics of environmental wine yeast strains reveals the natural mechanism of overcoming stuck fermentation.
    Szopinska A; Christ E; Planchon S; König H; Evers D; Renaut J
    Proteomics; 2016 Feb; 16(4):593-608. PubMed ID: 26763469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Aroma formation by immobilized yeast cells in fermentation processes.
    Nedović V; Gibson B; Mantzouridou TF; Bugarski B; Djordjević V; Kalušević A; Paraskevopoulou A; Sandell M; Šmogrovičová D; Yilmaztekin M
    Yeast; 2015 Jan; 32(1):173-216. PubMed ID: 25267117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Genetic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from palm wine in eastern Nigeria. Comparison with other African strains.
    Ezeronye OU; Legras JL
    J Appl Microbiol; 2009 May; 106(5):1569-78. PubMed ID: 19191945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Diversity and adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces wine yeast: a review.
    Marsit S; Dequin S
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2015 Nov; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 26205244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. From yeast genetics to biotechnology.
    Maráz A
    Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung; 2002; 49(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 12512257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Identification of target genes to control acetate yield during aerobic fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Curiel JA; Salvadó Z; Tronchoni J; Morales P; Rodrigues AJ; Quirós M; Gonzalez R
    Microb Cell Fact; 2016 Sep; 15(1):156. PubMed ID: 27627879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Natural yeast promoter variants reveal epistasis in the generation of transcriptional-mediated noise and its potential benefit in stressful conditions.
    Liu J; Martin-Yken H; Bigey F; Dequin S; François JM; Capp JP
    Genome Biol Evol; 2015 Mar; 7(4):969-84. PubMed ID: 25762217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Selected non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts in controlled multistarter fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Comitini F; Gobbi M; Domizio P; Romani C; Lencioni L; Mannazzu I; Ciani M
    Food Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 28(5):873-82. PubMed ID: 21569929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Massive QTL analysis identifies pleiotropic genetic determinants for stress resistance, aroma formation, and ethanol, glycerol and isobutanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Ho PW; Piampongsant S; Gallone B; Del Cortona A; Peeters PJ; Reijbroek F; Verbaet J; Herrera B; Cortebeeck J; Nolmans R; Saels V; Steensels J; Jarosz DF; Verstrepen KJ
    Biotechnol Biofuels; 2021 Nov; 14(1):211. PubMed ID: 34727964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Not your ordinary yeast: non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine production uncovered.
    Jolly NP; Varela C; Pretorius IS
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2014 Mar; 14(2):215-37. PubMed ID: 24164726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The use of genetically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in the wine industry.
    Schuller D; Casal M
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 68(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 15856224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. QTL analysis reveals genomic variants linked to high-temperature fermentation performance in the industrial yeast.
    Wang Z; Qi Q; Lin Y; Guo Y; Liu Y; Wang Q
    Biotechnol Biofuels; 2019; 12():59. PubMed ID: 30923567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.