452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27085587)
1. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy.
Graham CN; Maglinte GA; Schwartzberg LS; Price TJ; Knox HN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Fakih MG
Clin Ther; 2016 Jun; 38(6):1376-1391. PubMed ID: 27085587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Final results and outcomes by prior bevacizumab exposure, skin toxicity, and hypomagnesaemia from ASPECCT: randomized phase 3 non-inferiority study of panitumumab versus cetuximab in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer.
Price T; Kim TW; Li J; Cascinu S; Ruff P; Suresh AS; Thomas A; Tjulandin S; Guan X; Peeters M
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 68():51-59. PubMed ID: 27716478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-minimization analysis of panitumumab compared with cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Fakih MG; Knox HN; Maglinte GA; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Schwartzberg LS
J Med Econ; 2015; 18(8):619-28. PubMed ID: 25822327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Panitumumab versus cetuximab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (ASPECCT): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study.
Price TJ; Peeters M; Kim TW; Li J; Cascinu S; Ruff P; Suresh AS; Thomas A; Tjulandin S; Zhang K; Murugappan S; Sidhu R
Lancet Oncol; 2014 May; 15(6):569-79. PubMed ID: 24739896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-minimization analysis of biweekly dosing of cetuximab and FOLFIRI compared with panitumumab and FOLFOX for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in the United States.
Gathirua-Mwangi WG; Sethi H; Afable MG; Bhattacharyya D; Khan T
J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):1164-1172. PubMed ID: 34529522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.
Mittmann N; Au HJ; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Isogai PK; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Evans WK; Moore MJ; Siddiqui J; Findlay B; Colwell B; Simes J; Gibbs P; Links M; Tebbutt NC; Jonker DJ; ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1182-92. PubMed ID: 19666851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab and panitumumab for chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Carvalho AC; Leal F; Sasse AD
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175409. PubMed ID: 28403233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative net cost impact of the utilization of panitumumab versus cetuximab for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada.
Pettigrew M; Kavan P; Surprenant L; Lim HJ
J Med Econ; 2016; 19(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 26442575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.
Tikhonova IA; Huxley N; Snowsill T; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Napier M; Hoyle M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):837-851. PubMed ID: 29498000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-minimization analysis of the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Greece.
Fragoulakis V; Papagiannopoulou V; Kourlaba G; Maniadakis N; Fountzilas G
Clin Ther; 2012 Oct; 34(10):2132-42. PubMed ID: 23063374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. KRAS Testing for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based and Economic Analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(25):1-49. PubMed ID: 23074403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of KRAS testing and cetuximab as last-line therapy for colorectal cancer.
Shiroiwa T; Motoo Y; Tsutani K
Mol Diagn Ther; 2010 Dec; 14(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 21275455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.
Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH
J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany.
Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Göke B; Kirchner T; Santas CC; Goldberg RM
Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):438-45. PubMed ID: 21898389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N
J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
