These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27086105)

  • 1. Subjective qualitative assessment of the finish line of prosthetic preparations submitted to different finishing instruments.
    da Silva TF; de Melo MP; Pereira JR; Takeshita WM; Ceribelli BM; Vessoni Iwaki LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 27086105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces.
    Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 19643221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finishing tooth-colored restorations in vitro: an index of surface alteration and finish-line destruction.
    Schmidlin PR; Göhring TN
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 14753337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface roughness of dentin after tooth preparation with different rotary instrumentation.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Hassan MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Feb; 75(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 8667268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of ultrasonic instruments on the quality of preparation margins and bonding to dentin.
    Ellis R; Bennani V; Purton D; Chandler N; Lowe B
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Aug; 24(4):278-85. PubMed ID: 22863135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temperature variations in pulp chamber: an in-vitro comparison between ultrasonic and rotating instruments in tooth preparation. Part 1.
    Baldi D; Colombo J; Robiony M; Menini M; Bisagni E; Pera P
    Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Feb; 69(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 31633318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part II: electric handpiece and comparison with turbine.
    Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):319-31. PubMed ID: 19410066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of different grit sizes of diamond rotary instruments for tooth preparation on the retention and adaptation of complete coverage restorations.
    Li YQ; Wang H; Wang YJ; Chen JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 22304742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface roughness of restoration margin preparations: a comparative analysis of finishing techniques.
    Clarke I; Aquilia A; Bertassoni LE; Guazzato M; Klineberg I
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2015; 35(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 25738341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface properties of dental nanocomposites after finishing with rigid rotary instruments.
    Marchan SM; White D; Marchan QM; Dhuru V; Smith WA
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(5):519-27. PubMed ID: 23327227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal finishing for cast gold restorations: reciprocal-action instrumentation.
    Small KL; Goldfogel MH; Hicks MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Oct; 58(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 2822910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The effect of cavity finishing on the initial sealing capacity of amalgam fillings in vitro].
    Haller B; Klaiber B; Tens KD
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1991; 101(8):986-92. PubMed ID: 1882221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface roughness and cutting efficiency of composite finishing instruments.
    Jung M
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 9484147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasonic margin preparation for fixed prosthodontics: a pilot study.
    Horne P; Bennani V; Chandler N; Purton D
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Jun; 24(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 22691082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of finishing instrumentation on the marginal integrity of resin-based composite restorations.
    Maresca C; Pimenta LA; Heymann HO; Ziemiecki TL; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 20433561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The effect of 2 finishing methods on the micromorphology of the proximal box margin. An in-vivo study].
    Lussi A; Hugo B; Hotz P
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1992; 102(10):1175-80. PubMed ID: 1439693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
    Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.