113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27086302)
1. Comparing species decisions in a dichotomous choice task: adjusting task parameters improves performance in monkeys.
Prétôt L; Bshary R; Brosnan SF
Anim Cogn; 2016 Jul; 19(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 27086302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) succeed on a "complex" foraging task failed by nonhuman primates (Pan troglodytes, Pongo abelii, Sapajus apella) but solved by wrasse fish (Labroides dimidiatus)?
Pepperberg IM; Hartsfield LA
J Comp Psychol; 2014 Aug; 128(3):298-306. PubMed ID: 24798239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Irrational choice behavior in human and nonhuman primates.
Perdue BM; Brown ER
Anim Cogn; 2018 Mar; 21(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 29294199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do primates see the solitaire illusion differently? A comparative assessment of humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
Agrillo C; Parrish AE; Beran MJ
J Comp Psychol; 2014 Nov; 128(4):402-13. PubMed ID: 25133464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Working and waiting for better rewards: self-control in two monkey species (Cebus apella and Macaca mulatta).
Evans TA; Perdue BM; Parrish AE; Beran MJ
Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():236-42. PubMed ID: 24412729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative performance of orangutans (Pongo spp.), gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla), and drills (Mandrillus leucophaeus), in an ephemeral foraging task.
Prétôt L; Mickelberg J; Carrigan J; Stoinski T; Bshary R; Brosnan SF
Am J Primatol; 2021 Jan; 83(1):e23212. PubMed ID: 33135209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adult cleaner wrasse outperform capuchin monkeys, chimpanzees and orang-utans in a complex foraging task derived from cleaner--client reef fish cooperation.
Salwiczek LH; Prétôt L; Demarta L; Proctor D; Essler J; Pinto AI; Wismer S; Stoinski T; Brosnan SF; Bshary R
PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49068. PubMed ID: 23185293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monkeys exhibit human-like gaze biases in economic decisions.
Lupkin SM; McGinty VB
Elife; 2023 Jul; 12():. PubMed ID: 37497784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No evidence of the choice overload effect in a computerized paradigm with rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella).
Englund MD; Beran MJ
Behav Processes; 2022 Jan; 194():104545. PubMed ID: 34800607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing consistency in children's and monkeys' performance across computerized and manual detour problem tasks.
Gurgand L; Beran MJ
Behav Processes; 2021 Jan; 182():104291. PubMed ID: 33307123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Looking ahead? Computerized maze task performance by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella), and human children (Homo sapiens).
Beran MJ; Parrish AE; Futch SE; Evans TA; Perdue BM
J Comp Psychol; 2015 May; 129(2):160-73. PubMed ID: 25798793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) show understanding of human attentional states when requesting food held by a human.
Hattori Y; Kuroshima H; Fujita K
Anim Cogn; 2010 Jan; 13(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 19517147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Capuchin monkeys' use of human and conspecific cues to solve a hidden object-choice task.
Essler JL; Schwartz LP; Rossettie MS; Judge PG
Anim Cogn; 2017 Sep; 20(5):985-998. PubMed ID: 28741081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analogical reasoning in a capuchin monkey (Cebus apella).
Kennedy EH; Fragaszy DM
J Comp Psychol; 2008 May; 122(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 18489232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perseveration on a reversal-learning task correlates with rates of self-directed behavior in nonhuman primates.
Judge PG; Evans DW; Schroepfer KK; Gross AC
Behav Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 222(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 21419808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The performance of cleaner wrasse,
Gingins S; Marcadier F; Wismer S; Krattinger O; Quattrini F; Bshary R; Binning SA
PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4745. PubMed ID: 29761057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do cleaner fish learn to feed against their preference in a reverse reward contingency task?
Danisman E; Bshary R; Bergmüller R
Anim Cogn; 2010 Jan; 13(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19533186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Waiting by mistake: symbolic representation of rewards modulates intertemporal choice in capuchin monkeys, preschool children and adult humans.
Addessi E; Bellagamba F; Delfino A; De Petrillo F; Focaroli V; Macchitella L; Maggiorelli V; Pace B; Pecora G; Rossi S; Sbaffi A; Tasselli MI; Paglieri F
Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):428-41. PubMed ID: 24387915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modelling how cleaner fish approach an ephemeral reward task demonstrates a role for ecologically tuned chunking in the evolution of advanced cognition.
Prat Y; Bshary R; Lotem A
PLoS Biol; 2022 Jan; 20(1):e3001519. PubMed ID: 34986149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) behaviorally cope with increasing delay in a self-control task.
Ventricelli M; Focaroli V; De Petrillo F; Macchitella L; Paglieri F; Addessi E
Behav Processes; 2013 Nov; 100():146-52. PubMed ID: 24056241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
