310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27086370)
1. Revisiting the Ethics of Research on Human Subjects.
Tsay C
AMA J Ethics; 2015 Dec; 17(12):1105-7. PubMed ID: 27086370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Vulnerability to influence: a two-way street.
Henderson GE; Davis AM; King NM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):50-2; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Trust, understanding and utopia in the research setting.
Justo L
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):56-8; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In plain sight: a solution to a fundamental challenge in human research.
Shepherd L; Riley MF
J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):970-89. PubMed ID: 23289699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The case for evidence-based rulemaking in human subjects research.
Sachs B
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):3-13. PubMed ID: 20526958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.
Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB
J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The fetus as a patient and the ethics of human subjects research: response to commentaries on "An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients".
McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):W3-7. PubMed ID: 21534136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Disclosing clinical trial results: publicity, significance and independence.
Liao SM; Sheehan M; Clarke S
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):W3-5. PubMed ID: 19998144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Beginning anew: same principles, different direction for research ethics.
Simmerling M; Schwegler B
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):44-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical rules for human subjects research: a case where the "is" must inform the "ought".
Kon AA
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 20526960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Respect as an organizing normative category for research ethics.
McGuire AL; McCullough LB
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):W1-2. PubMed ID: 16036642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The perverse consequences of a proposed global tax on research.
MacDonald C; Walton N
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):46-7. PubMed ID: 20526972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Response to open peer commentaries on "assessing the remedy: the case for contracts in clinical trials".
Edwards SJ
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):W1-3. PubMed ID: 21480062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Vulnerability as the inability of researchers to act in the best interest of a subject.
VanderWalde AM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):65-6; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):39-49. PubMed ID: 21534151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical considerations in phenomenological research.
Walker W
Nurse Res; 2007; 14(3):36-45. PubMed ID: 17494467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conflict of interest in human subjects research.
Groeger JS; Barnes M
Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3 Suppl):S137-42. PubMed ID: 12626959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomization and the transactional framework for informed consent.
Reynolds D; Fleming DA
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):16-7. PubMed ID: 19180385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomization can be risky.
Lott J
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 19180386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding randomization: helpful strategies.
Brody H; Childress AM
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 19180384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
