BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2708666)

  • 1. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. II: Measurements in steady-state and impulse noise environments.
    Giguère C; Kunov H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1197-205. PubMed ID: 2708666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. I: Design and construction.
    Kunov H; Giguère C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1191-6. PubMed ID: 2708665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spectral analysis of hearing protector impulsive insertion loss.
    Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Murphy WJ; Stergar ME
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):13-21. PubMed ID: 27885881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part II: Modeling the external ear, simulating bone conduction, and comparing test fixture and real-ear data.
    Schroeter J; Poesselt C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):505-27. PubMed ID: 3745683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part I: Review of previous work and the design of an improved test fixture.
    Schroeter J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1065-81. PubMed ID: 3700862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
    Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
    Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attenuation characteristics of an extended-wear hearing aid: Impulse and continuous noise.
    Brungart DS; Spencer NJ; Pryor N; Abouzahra N; McKenna EA; Iyer N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Sep; 148(3):1404. PubMed ID: 33003895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is it necessary to measure hearing protector attenuation at 3.15 and 6.3 kHz?
    Berger EH; Rowland LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1590-4. PubMed ID: 2708676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-ear attenuation of earmuffs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Suter AH; Lempert BL; Franks JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2114-7. PubMed ID: 2348018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of physiological noise and the occlusion effect on the measurement of real-ear attenuation at threshold.
    Berger EH; Kerivan JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 6886201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attenuation of high-level impulses by earmuffs.
    Zera J; Mlynski R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2082-96. PubMed ID: 17902846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of clinical techniques for verification of uniform attenuation earplugs.
    Portnuff CDF; Price D
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Feb; 58(sup1):S33-S39. PubMed ID: 30618313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices.
    Berger EH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jun; 79(6):1655-87. PubMed ID: 3522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
    Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The acoustical attenuation of some combinations of earplugs and earmuffs.
    Rawlinson RD; Wheeler PD; Custard G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1987; 31(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 3426030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of wearing an anti-flash hood on the noise attenuation of earmuffs.
    Paddan GS; Lower MC
    Ind Health; 2021 Sep; 59(4):204-219. PubMed ID: 33692247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.