These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2708666)

  • 21. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method.
    Aliabadi M; Biabani A; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Work; 2018; 60(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 29865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hearing protection: surpassing the limits to attenuation imposed by the bone-conduction pathways.
    Berger EH; Kieper RW; Gauger D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):1955-67. PubMed ID: 14587596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of hearing protection on sound localization and orienting behavior.
    Simpson BD; Bolia RS; McKinley RL; Brungart DS
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):188-98. PubMed ID: 15960096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Determining attenuation of impulse noise with an electrical equivalent of a hearing protection device.
    Młyński R; Kozłowski E
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2013; 19(1):127-41. PubMed ID: 23498707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The difference in protection efficiency between earplugs and earmuffs. An investigation performed at a workplace.
    Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
    Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 7466283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effectiveness of earplugs in high-intensity impulse noise.
    Dancer A; Grateau P; Cabanis A; Barnabé G; Cagnin G; Vaillant T; Lafont D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Mar; 91(3):1677-89. PubMed ID: 1564203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of hearing protection devices on speech intelligibility of Persian employees.
    Karami M; Aliabadi M; Golmohammadi R; Hamidi Nahrani M
    BMC Res Notes; 2020 Nov; 13(1):529. PubMed ID: 33176877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Change of the peak level and frequency of impulse sound between free field and meatal cavity in its significance for acoustic trauma (author's transl)].
    Pfander F
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Oct; 60(10):517-9. PubMed ID: 7345278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Four earplugs in search of a rating system.
    Franks JR; Murphy WJ; Johnson JL; Harris DA
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 10890730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Verification of Attenuation for Premolded Hearing Protection Devices Designed for Music.
    Zaccardi TA; Portnuff CD; Le Prell CG
    Med Probl Perform Art; 2022 Jun; 37(2):78-88. PubMed ID: 35637560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hearing protection against high-level shooting impulses in relation to hearing damage risk criteria.
    Pekkarinen JO; Starck JP; Ylikoski JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):196-202. PubMed ID: 1737871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Noise attenuation and proper insertion of earplugs into ear canals.
    Toivonen M; Pääkkönen R; Savolainen S; Lehtomäki K
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2002 Aug; 46(6):527-30. PubMed ID: 12176767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acoustic Performance of 3D Printed Nanocomposite Earmuff.
    Ahmadi S; Nassiri P; Ghasemi I; Monazzam Ep MR
    Glob J Health Sci; 2015 May; 8(1):180-8. PubMed ID: 26234977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube.
    Murphy WJ; Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Shaw PB; Stergar M
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):364-73. PubMed ID: 26356380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physical characteristics of gunfire impulse noise and its attenuation by hearing protectors.
    Ylikoski M; Pekkarinen JO; Starck JP; Pääkkönen RJ; Ylikoski JS
    Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 7761796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dependence of acoustic attenuation of hearing protectors on incident sound level.
    Martin AM
    Br J Ind Med; 1979 Feb; 36(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 444436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.