These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2708666)

  • 41. A Tester to Evaluate the Correct Placement of Earplugs.
    Kozlowski E; Mlynski R; Morzynski L; Swidzinski A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Measuring helmet sound attenuation characteristics using an acoustic manikin.
    Ivey ES; Nerbonne GP; Tolhurst GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):370-5. PubMed ID: 3558955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise.
    Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M; Dudarewicz A; Bak M; Fiszer M; Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 15387085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Role of the kurtosis statistic in evaluating complex noise exposures for the protection of hearing.
    Davis RI; Qiu W; Hamernik RP
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 19657275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Is real-ear attenuation at threshold a function of hearing level?
    Berger EH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Nov; 78(5):1588-95. PubMed ID: 4067074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Characteristics of noise exposure during solitary trumpet playing: immediate impact on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and long-term implications for hearing.
    Poissant SF; Freyman RL; MacDonald AJ; Nunes HA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):543-53. PubMed ID: 22531575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The efficiency of earmuffs against impulse noise from firearms.
    Ylikoski J; Pekkarinen J; Starck J
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 3629173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Training in using earplugs or using earplugs with a higher than necessary noise reduction rating? A randomized clinical trial.
    Salmani Nodoushan M; Mehrparvar AH; Torab Jahromi M; Safaei S; Mollasadeghi A
    Int J Occup Environ Med; 2014 Oct; 5(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 25270008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation.
    Valentin O; John SM; Laville F
    Noise Health; 2017; 19(86):1-9. PubMed ID: 28164933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Noise reduction at the shooting range by means of level-dependent hearing protectors.
    Młyński R; Kozłowski E
    Med Pr; 2019 Jun; 70(3):265-273. PubMed ID: 30887954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Observations on the correlation of subjective and objective attenuation measurements on earplugs.
    Liu Y; Wells L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Feb; 147(2):941. PubMed ID: 32113303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of impulse noise on hearing - introduction.
    Coles RR
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):11-3. PubMed ID: 6939078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuation of hearing protection devices: sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility.
    Murphy WJ; Franks JR; Berger EH; Behar A; Casali JG; Dixon-Ernst C; Krieg EF; Mozo BT; Royster JD; Royster LH; Simon SD; Stephenson C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):311-23. PubMed ID: 14759024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Training on hearing protector insertion improves noise attenuation.
    Samelli AG; Rocha CH; Theodósio P; Moreira RR; Neves-Lobo IF
    Codas; 2015; 27(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 26691614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss for four hearing protection devices in field conditions.
    Murphy WJ; Flamme GA; Meinke DK; Sondergaard J; Finan DS; Lankford JE; Khan A; Vernon J; Stewart M
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51 Suppl 1(0 1):S31-42. PubMed ID: 22176308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Differences in efficiency of earplugs and earmuffs measured as hearing impairments from two workshops.
    Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):194-9. PubMed ID: 6939088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The insertion loss distribution function of an ear plug, and its implications for the ear plug acceptability.
    Lenzuni P; Annesi D; Nataletti P
    Noise Health; 2020; 22(105):35-45. PubMed ID: 33380615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Assessment of the impulse noise attenuation by earplugs in metalworking processes].
    Mlyński R; Kozlowski E
    Med Pr; 2014; 65(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 25090849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging.
    Brummett RE; Talbot JM; Charuhas P
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):539-40. PubMed ID: 3175004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Attenuation of peak sound pressure levels of shooting noise by hearing protective earmuffs.
    Lenzuni P; Sangiorgi T; Cerini L
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(58):91-9. PubMed ID: 22718106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.