These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27087403)

  • 61. The osteoporosis needs of patients with wrist fracture.
    Bogoch ER; Elliot-Gibson V; Escott BG; Beaton DE
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Sep; 22(8 Suppl):S73-8. PubMed ID: 18753893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparative effectiveness of osteoporosis drugs in preventing secondary nonvertebral fractures in Taiwanese women.
    Lin TC; Yang CY; Yang YH; Lin SJ
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2013 Dec; 98(12):4717-26. PubMed ID: 24081731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Development of fracture liaison services: What have we learned?
    Shipman KE; Doyle A; Arden H; Jones T; Gittoes NJ
    Injury; 2017 Dec; 48 Suppl 7():S4-S9. PubMed ID: 28870623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Antiresorptive treatment, when initiated after a first hip fracture, may not protect of a second contralateral episode in elderly population: A study with 685 patients.
    Besalduch M; Carrera I; Gómez-Masdeu M; De Caso J
    Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):877-80. PubMed ID: 26892501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Long-term persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs after fracture.
    Klop C; Welsing PM; Elders PJ; Overbeek JA; Souverein PC; Burden AM; van Onzenoort HA; Leufkens HG; Bijlsma JW; de Vries F
    Osteoporos Int; 2015 Jun; 26(6):1831-40. PubMed ID: 25822104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Osteoporotic Fracture Program management: who should be in charge? A comparative survey of knowledge in orthopaedic surgeons and internists.
    Sorbi R; Aghamirsalim M
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 99(6):723-30. PubMed ID: 23849486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Osteoporosis in orthopaedic trauma patients: a diagnosis and treatment protocol.
    Collinge C; LeBus G; Gardner MJ; Gehrig L
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Sep; 22(8):541-7; discussion 548-9. PubMed ID: 18758285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. GP perceptions on improving a secondary care-based Fracture Liaison Service (FLS).
    Crawford-Manning F; Gould K; Dale N; Dowson C; Paskins Z
    Osteoporos Int; 2020 Dec; 31(12):2493-2494. PubMed ID: 32968890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Multidisciplinary model for hospital-territory integrated management of patient with bone fragility: primary and secondary prevention of fractures according to severity and complexity.
    Caffetti C; Bogliolo L; Giuffrè G; Sozzi A; Degli Esposti L; Bellis E; Montecucco C; Reitano F; Triarico A; Silva S; Bejor M; Muzzi A; Mirabile P; Ramaioli N; Brait M
    Reumatismo; 2020 Jul; 72(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 32700873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Assessment and management of imminent fracture risk in the setting of the fracture liaison service.
    Javaid MK; Harvey NC; McCloskey EV; Kanis JA; Cooper C
    Osteoporos Int; 2022 Jun; 33(6):1185-1189. PubMed ID: 35286437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The fracture liaison service, a step forward not only in fracture reduction, but also in mortality reduction.
    Lems WF; van den Bergh JP; Geusens PPMM
    Osteoporos Int; 2022 Aug; 33(8):1639-1640. PubMed ID: 35166862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Bone care nurses and the evolution of the nurse's educational function: the Guardian Angel(®) research project.
    Alvaro R; Pennini A; Zannetti EB; Cittadini N; Feola M; Rao C; D'Agostino F; Vellone E; Tarantino U
    Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab; 2015; 12(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 26136795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Addressing Barriers to Secondary Fracture Prevention.
    Tabatabai LS; Petak SM
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 26254686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. What Makes a Fracture Liaison Service Effective, and How Do You Measure Its Success?
    Grajower MM
    Endocr Pract; 2018 Aug; 24(8):764-765. PubMed ID: 30084680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Imminent Fracture Risk: A Call to Action for Rheumatologists.
    Danila MI; Saag KG
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2020 Jun; 72(6):741-743. PubMed ID: 32100968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Editorial: Secondary Fracture Prevention-What's Your System?
    Leopold SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 478(8):1703-1705. PubMed ID: 32732553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Fracture liaison services: past, present and future : Editorial relating to: The impact of Fracture Liaison Services on subsequent fractures and mortality: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Ganda K
    Osteoporos Int; 2021 Aug; 32(8):1461-1464. PubMed ID: 34272584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Fracture Liaison Service: Prevention by Coordination.
    Chadha M; Shingare A; Prasanth A; Chauhan P; Shah NF
    Indian J Endocrinol Metab; 2018; 22(6):719-721. PubMed ID: 30766806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Out-patient Organization in a Fracture Clinic.
    Doran FS
    Br Med J; 1943 Apr; 1(4291):420-1. PubMed ID: 20784771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Five-year refracture rates of a province-wide fracture liaison service.
    Sujic R; Beaton DE; Mamdani M; Cadarette SM; Luo J; Jaglal S; Sale JEM; Jain R; Bogoch E;
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1671-1677. PubMed ID: 31152183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.