These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
726 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27087463)
1. Chemical Retraction Agents - in vivo and in vitro Studies into their Physico-Chemical Properties, Biocompatibility with Gingival Margin Tissues and Compatibility with Elastomer Impression Materials. Nowakowska D; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Wicckiewicz W Mini Rev Med Chem; 2017; 17(5):435-444. PubMed ID: 27087463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Setting Time of Polyether Impression Materials after Contact with Conventional and Experimental Gingival Margin Displacement Agents. Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Ziętek M; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 27333590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polymerization time compatibility index of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials with conventional and experimental gingival margin displacement agents. Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 24461950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords. Kumbuloglu O; User A; Toksavul S; Boyacioglu H Quintessence Int; 2007 Feb; 38(2):e92-8. PubMed ID: 17510720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials. Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of a cordless retraction paste on titanium surface: a topographic, chemical and biocompatibility evaluation. Cooper K; Bennani V; Tawse-Smith A; Reid M; Stirling C; Dias G Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 23739788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonsurgical gingival displacement in restorative dentistry. Thomas MS; Joseph RM; Parolia A Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Jun; 32(5):26-34; quiz 36, 38. PubMed ID: 21755893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Gingival retraction using Gingifoam. Inflation exposes the margin]. Martignoni M; Feinman P Attual Dent; 1985 Nov; 1(30):13-7. PubMed ID: 3914901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth: current status. Bennani V; Schwass D; Chandler N J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Oct; 139(10):1354-63. PubMed ID: 18832271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Gingival retraction methods. A literature review]. Tosches NA; Salvi GE Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2009; 119(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 19306598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates. Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker M J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 18533981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques. Baba NZ; Goodacre CJ; Jekki R; Won J Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 58(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 24286645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The global impression technic in fixed dentures]. Lamy M; Mainjot A Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 16193850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Elastomeric impression materials]. Levartovsky S; Folkman M; Alter E; Pilo R Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2011 Apr; 28(2):54-64, 75. PubMed ID: 21848031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effect of different kinds of gingival retraction agents on the polymerization inhibition of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials]. Hou QQ; Ge H; Gao YM Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2023 Jun; 32(3):251-254. PubMed ID: 37803978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]