These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2708765)

  • 1. Investigation of the Alges bifocal.
    Josephson JE; Caffery BE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Mar; 60(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 2708765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient response to concentric bifocal contact lenses.
    Harris MG; Sheedy JE; Bronge MR; Joe SM; Mook MA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 May; 62(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 1813535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast visual acuity with bifocal contact lenses.
    Ueda K; Inagaki Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 17496703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical experience with the Tangent Streak RGP bifocal contact lens.
    Josephson JE; Wong M; Caffery BE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Mar; 60(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 2708764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of fitting presbyopic patients with contact lenses.
    Kuhl SA; Henry VA; Bennett ES
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Mar; 63(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 1583278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
    Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Tangent Streak rigid gas permeable bifocal contact lens.
    Remba MJ
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Mar; 59(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 3351189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of three bifocal contact lenses.
    Van Meter WS; Gussler JR; Litteral G
    CLAO J; 1990; 16(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 2379307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors influencing success of monovision contact lens fitting: survey of contact lens diplomates.
    Westin E; Wick B; Harrist RB
    Optometry; 2000 Dec; 71(12):757-63. PubMed ID: 11145300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective clinical evaluation of the Acuvue Bifocal contact lens.
    Key JE; Yee JL
    CLAO J; 1999 Oct; 25(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 10555737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between "readables" aspheric spectacle lenses and conventional spherical spectacle lenses for overcorrection of presbyopic single-vision contact lens wearers.
    Bachman WG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 8454839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristics and functional outcomes of 130 patients with keratoconus attending a specialist contact lens clinic.
    Lim N; Vogt U
    Eye (Lond); 2002 Jan; 16(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 11913889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adverse events and discontinuations during 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):288-92. PubMed ID: 17993823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of the performance of the Menifocal Z gas-permeable bifocal contact lens during continuous wear.
    Lakkis C; Goldenberg SA; Woods CA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 82(12):1022-9. PubMed ID: 16357643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses: vision-related quality of life.
    Lipson MJ; Musch DC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 17632307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fitting contact lenses for visual rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty.
    Wietharn BE; Driebe WT
    Eye Contact Lens; 2004 Jan; 30(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 14722466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the ZEBRA 2000 (Z-10) Breger Vision bifocal contact lens.
    Smith VM; Koffler BH; Litteral G
    CLAO J; 2000 Oct; 26(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 11071346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of adverse events with daily disposable hydrogels and spectacle wear: results from a 12-month prospective clinical trial.
    Sankaridurg PR; Sweeney DF; Holden BA; Naduvilath T; Velala I; Gora R; Krishnamachary M; Rao GN
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2327-34. PubMed ID: 14644714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.