These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2708767)

  • 1. Effects of interocular blur suppression ability on monovision task performance.
    Schor C; Carson M; Peterson G; Suzuki J; Erickson P
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Mar; 60(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 2708767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision.
    Schor C; Landsman L; Erickson P
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Oct; 64(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 3688174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gait alterations negotiating a raised surface induced by monocular blur.
    Vale A; Buckley JG; Elliott DB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1128-34. PubMed ID: 19050467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monovision: a review.
    Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Sep; 27(5):417-39. PubMed ID: 17718882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An exploration of modified monovision with diffractive bifocal contact lenses.
    Freeman MH; Charman WN
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Jul; 30(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 17289423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.
    Kirschen DG; Hung CC; Nakano TR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 76(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 10612404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of monocular refractive blur on gait parameters when negotiating a raised surface.
    Vale A; Scally A; Buckley JG; Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Mar; 28(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 18339044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of monovision lenses on the near-point range of single binocular vision.
    McGill EC; Erickson P
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Nov; 62(11):828-31. PubMed ID: 1813510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors influencing success of monovision contact lens fitting: survey of contact lens diplomates.
    Westin E; Wick B; Harrist RB
    Optometry; 2000 Dec; 71(12):757-63. PubMed ID: 11145300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interocular blur suppression and monovision.
    Collins MJ; Goode A
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1994 Jun; 72(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 7976272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patterns of binocular suppression and accommodation in monovision.
    Schor C; Erickson P
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Nov; 65(11):853-61. PubMed ID: 3252731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision.
    Gupta N; Naroo SA; Wolffsohn JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 86(2):E98-105. PubMed ID: 19156009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive gait changes in long-term wearers of contact lens monovision correction.
    Chapman GJ; Vale A; Buckley J; Scally AJ; Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 May; 30(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 20444135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monovision in LASIK.
    Braun EH; Lee J; Steinert RF
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Jul; 115(7):1196-202. PubMed ID: 18061266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monovision: Consequences for depth perception from large disparities.
    Smith CE; Allison RS; Wilkinson F; Wilcox LM
    Exp Eye Res; 2019 Jun; 183():62-67. PubMed ID: 30237103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of sighting and sensory dominance on monovision high and low contrast visual acuity.
    Robboy MW; Cox IG; Erickson P
    CLAO J; 1990; 16(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 2249349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ocular dominance and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by intraocular lens implantation.
    Handa T; Mukuno K; Uozato H; Niida T; Shoji N; Minei R; Nitta M; Shimizu K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 15093637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate cortical adaptation in visual and non-visual areas functions induced by monovision.
    Zeri F; Berchicci M; Naroo SA; Pitzalis S; Di Russo F
    J Physiol; 2018 Jan; 596(2):253-266. PubMed ID: 29071723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.