These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27087676)

  • 41. Changes in foot and shank coupling due to alterations in foot strike pattern during running.
    Pohl MB; Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Mar; 23(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 18006125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison of the ground reaction force frequency content during rearfoot and non-rearfoot running patterns.
    Gruber AH; Edwards WB; Hamill J; Derrick TR; Boyer KA
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jul; 56():54-59. PubMed ID: 28499137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fore- and rearfoot kinematics in high- and low-arched individuals during running.
    Barnes A; Wheat J; Milner CE
    Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Jul; 32(7):710-6. PubMed ID: 21972767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact Acceleration During Prolonged Running While Wearing Conventional Versus Minimalist Shoes.
    Izquierdo-Renau M; Queralt A; Encarnación-Martínez A; Perez-Soriano P
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2021 Mar; 92(1):182-188. PubMed ID: 32097102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Acute effect of different minimalist shoes on foot strike pattern and kinematics in rearfoot strikers during running.
    Squadrone R; Rodano R; Hamill J; Preatoni E
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(11):1196-204. PubMed ID: 25529114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of tibial shock feedback training on impact loading and running economy.
    Clansey AC; Hanlon M; Wallace ES; Nevill A; Lake MJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014; 46(5):973-81. PubMed ID: 24121245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Foot accelerations are larger than tibia accelerations during sprinting when measured with inertial measurement units.
    Glassbrook DJ; Fuller JT; Alderson JA; Doyle TLA
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Feb; 38(3):248-255. PubMed ID: 31726955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influence of running velocity on resultant tibial acceleration in runners.
    Sheerin KR; Besier TF; Reid D
    Sports Biomech; 2020 Dec; 19(6):750-760. PubMed ID: 30537920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Is the rearfoot pattern the most frequently foot strike pattern among recreational shod distance runners?
    de Almeida MO; Saragiotto BT; Yamato TP; Lopes AD
    Phys Ther Sport; 2015 Feb; 16(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 24894762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Is midsole thickness a key parameter for the running pattern?
    Chambon N; Delattre N; Guéguen N; Berton E; Rao G
    Gait Posture; 2014; 40(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 24636223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of foot orthoses with forefoot cushioning or metatarsal pad on forefoot peak plantar pressure in running.
    Hähni M; Hirschmüller A; Baur H
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2016; 9():44. PubMed ID: 27891180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Impact accelerations during a prolonged run using a microwavable self-customised foot orthosis.
    Jimenez-Perez I; Priego-Quesada JI; Camacho-García A; Cibrián Ortiz de Anda RM; Pérez-Soriano P
    Sports Biomech; 2024 Jul; 23(7):935-948. PubMed ID: 34126852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Contributions of lower extremity kinematics to trunk accelerations during moderate treadmill running.
    Lindsay TR; Yaggie JA; McGregor SJ
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Dec; 11():162. PubMed ID: 25495782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Duty factor and foot-strike pattern do not represent similar running pattern at the individual level.
    Patoz A; Lussiana T; Breine B; Gindre C; Malatesta D
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):13061. PubMed ID: 35906382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Initial foot contact and related kinematics affect impact loading rate in running.
    Breine B; Malcolm P; Van Caekenberghe I; Fiers P; Frederick EC; De Clercq D
    J Sports Sci; 2017 Aug; 35(15):1556-1564. PubMed ID: 27624557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Head and Tibial Acceleration as a Function of Stride Frequency and Visual Feedback during Running.
    Busa MA; Lim J; van Emmerik RE; Hamill J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157297. PubMed ID: 27271850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The measurement of tibial acceleration in runners-A review of the factors that can affect tibial acceleration during running and evidence-based guidelines for its use.
    Sheerin KR; Reid D; Besier TF
    Gait Posture; 2019 Jan; 67():12-24. PubMed ID: 30248663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Foot strike pattern, step rate, and trunk posture combined gait modifications to reduce impact loading during running.
    Huang Y; Xia H; Chen G; Cheng S; Cheung RTH; Shull PB
    J Biomech; 2019 Mar; 86():102-109. PubMed ID: 30792072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Foot strike patterns of runners at the 15-km point during an elite-level half marathon.
    Hasegawa H; Yamauchi T; Kraemer WJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 Aug; 21(3):888-93. PubMed ID: 17685722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Stress distribution of metatarsals during forefoot strike versus rearfoot strike: A finite element study.
    Li S; Zhang Y; Gu Y; Ren J
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Dec; 91():38-46. PubMed ID: 29031665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.