These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27087781)
1. Near/far matching: a study design approach to instrumental variables. Baiocchi M; Small DS; Yang L; Polsky D; Groeneveld PW Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol; 2012 Dec; 12(4):237-253. PubMed ID: 27087781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Near-Far Matching in R: The nearfar Package. Rigdon J; Baiocchi M; Basu S J Stat Softw; 2018; 86(CS-5):. PubMed ID: 30386186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing Long-term Mortality After Carotid Endarterectomy vs Carotid Stenting Using a Novel Instrumental Variable Method for Risk Adjustment in Observational Time-to-Event Data. Columbo JA; Martinez-Camblor P; MacKenzie TA; Staiger DO; Kang R; Goodney PP; O'Malley AJ JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Sep; 1(5):e181676. PubMed ID: 30646140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods. Stukel TA; Fisher ES; Wennberg DE; Alter DA; Gottlieb DJ; Vermeulen MJ JAMA; 2007 Jan; 297(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 17227979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic variable selection for exposure-driven propensity score matching with unmeasured confounders. Zöller D; Wockner LF; Binder H Biom J; 2020 May; 62(3):868-884. PubMed ID: 32203625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding Causal Distributional and Subgroup Effects With the Instrumental Propensity Score. Cheng J; Lin W Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 187(3):614-622. PubMed ID: 29020138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies. Hogan JW; Lancaster T Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 14746439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the effect of treatment on binary outcomes using full matching on the propensity score. Austin PC; Stuart EA Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2505-2525. PubMed ID: 26329750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes. Austin PC; Stuart EA Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early outcomes after carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Choi JC; Johnston SC; Kim AS Stroke; 2015 Jan; 46(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 25424479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy Among Medicare Beneficiaries. Jalbert JJ; Nguyen LL; Gerhard-Herman MD; Kumamaru H; Chen CY; Williams LA; Liu J; Rothman AT; Jaff MR; Seeger JD; Benenati JF; Schneider PA; Aronow HD; Johnston JA; Brott TG; Tsai TT; White CJ; Setoguchi S Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2016 May; 9(3):275-85. PubMed ID: 27116974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. There's a reason they call them dummy variables: a note on the use of structural equation techniques in comparative effectiveness research. Crown WH Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(10):947-55. PubMed ID: 20831303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pre-processing data to reduce biases: full matching incorporating an instrumental variable in population-based studies. Cerna-Turoff I; Maurer K; Baiocchi M Int J Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 51(6):1920-1930. PubMed ID: 35560220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating long-term effects of a psychiatric treatment using instrumental variable and matching approaches. Lu B; Marcus S Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol; 2012 Dec; 12(4):288-301. PubMed ID: 23483774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fixed and variable cost of carotid endarterectomy and stenting in the United States: A comparative study. Obeid T; Alshaikh H; Nejim B; Arhuidese I; Locham S; Malas M J Vasc Surg; 2017 May; 65(5):1398-1406.e1. PubMed ID: 28216356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assignment-Control Plots: A Visual Companion for Causal Inference Study Design. Aikens RC; Baiocchi M Am Stat; 2023; 77(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 36776489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Editor's Choice - Comparison of Early Outcomes and Restenosis Rate Between Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Heo SH; Yoon KW; Woo SY; Park YJ; Kim YW; Kim KH; Chung CS; Bang OY; Kim DI Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2017 Nov; 54(5):573-578. PubMed ID: 28893482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating Causal Associations of Fine Particles With Daily Deaths in Boston. Schwartz J; Austin E; Bind MA; Zanobetti A; Koutrakis P Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 182(7):644-50. PubMed ID: 26346544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The productivity of mental health care: an instrumental variable approach. Lu M J Ment Health Policy Econ; 1999 Jun; 2(2):59-71. PubMed ID: 11967410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Instrumental variable analysis in the presence of unmeasured confounding. Zhang Z; Uddin MJ; Cheng J; Huang T Ann Transl Med; 2018 May; 6(10):182. PubMed ID: 29951504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]