These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27087932)

  • 1. Postmating-prezygotic isolation between two allopatric populations of Drosophila montana: fertilisation success differs under sperm competition.
    Ala-Honkola O; Ritchie MG; Veltsos P
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Mar; 6(6):1679-91. PubMed ID: 27087932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seminal fluid protein divergence among populations exhibiting postmating prezygotic reproductive isolation.
    Garlovsky MD; Evans C; Rosenow MA; Karr TL; Snook RR
    Mol Ecol; 2020 Nov; 29(22):4428-4441. PubMed ID: 32939895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Persistent postmating, prezygotic reproductive isolation between populations.
    Garlovsky MD; Snook RR
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Sep; 8(17):9062-9073. PubMed ID: 30271566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence.
    Garlovsky MD; Yusuf LH; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Dec; 375(1813):20200071. PubMed ID: 33070721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproductive isolation among allopatric Drosophila montana populations.
    Jennings JH; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3095-108. PubMed ID: 25302639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual and postmating reproductive isolation between allopatric Drosophila montana populations suggest speciation potential.
    Jennings JH; Mazzi D; Ritchie MG; Hoikkala A
    BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Mar; 11():68. PubMed ID: 21396136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple Genes Cause Postmating Prezygotic Reproductive Isolation in the Drosophila virilis Group.
    Ahmed-Braimah YH
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Dec; 6(12):4067-4076. PubMed ID: 27729433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproductive Isolation through Experimental Manipulation of Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Syed ZA; Chatterjee M; Samant MA; Prasad NG
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3330. PubMed ID: 28611437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Rate of Evolution of Postmating-Prezygotic Reproductive Isolation in Drosophila.
    Turissini DA; McGirr JA; Patel SS; David JR; Matute DR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Feb; 35(2):312-334. PubMed ID: 29048573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postmating sexual selection: allopatric evolution of sperm competition mechanisms and genital morphology in calopterygid damselflies (Insecta: Odonata).
    Cordero Rivera A; Andrés JA; Córdoba-Aguilar A; Utzeri C
    Evolution; 2004 Feb; 58(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 15068351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cryptic male mate choice for high-quality females reduces male postcopulatory success in future matings.
    Anastasio OE; Sinclair CS; Pischedda A
    Evolution; 2023 Jun; 77(6):1396-1407. PubMed ID: 37073992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Divergent evolutionary trajectories shape the postmating transcriptional profiles of conspecifically and heterospecifically mated cactophilic Drosophila females.
    Diaz F; Allan CW; Chen X; Coleman JM; Bono JM; Matzkin LM
    Commun Biol; 2022 Aug; 5(1):842. PubMed ID: 35986208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strength of sexual and postmating prezygotic barriers varies between sympatric populations with different histories and species abundances.
    Poikela N; Kinnunen J; Wurdack M; Kauranen H; Schmitt T; Kankare M; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2019 Jun; 73(6):1182-1199. PubMed ID: 30957216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid diversification of sperm precedence traits and processes among three sibling Drosophila species.
    Manier MK; Belote JM; Berben KS; Lüpold S; Ala-Honkola O; Collins WF; Pitnick S
    Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2348-62. PubMed ID: 23888856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sperm competition games: sperm selection by females.
    Ball MA; Parker GA
    J Theor Biol; 2003 Sep; 224(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 12900202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila.
    Price CS
    Nature; 1997 Aug; 388(6643):663-6. PubMed ID: 9262398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in
    Davis JS; Castillo DM; Moyle LC
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Jan; 7(2):507-515. PubMed ID: 28116047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sperm competition experiments reveal low prezygotic postmating isolation between parasitic and nonparasitic lamprey ecotypes.
    Decanter N; Normand R; Souissi A; Labbé C; Edeline E; Evanno G
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e9970. PubMed ID: 37021081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Condition-dependent interaction between mating success and competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.
    De Nardo AN; Roy J; Sbilordo SH; Lüpold S
    Evolution; 2021 Aug; 75(8):2014-2026. PubMed ID: 33834478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.