BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27087932)

  • 1. Postmating-prezygotic isolation between two allopatric populations of Drosophila montana: fertilisation success differs under sperm competition.
    Ala-Honkola O; Ritchie MG; Veltsos P
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Mar; 6(6):1679-91. PubMed ID: 27087932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seminal fluid protein divergence among populations exhibiting postmating prezygotic reproductive isolation.
    Garlovsky MD; Evans C; Rosenow MA; Karr TL; Snook RR
    Mol Ecol; 2020 Nov; 29(22):4428-4441. PubMed ID: 32939895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Persistent postmating, prezygotic reproductive isolation between populations.
    Garlovsky MD; Snook RR
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Sep; 8(17):9062-9073. PubMed ID: 30271566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence.
    Garlovsky MD; Yusuf LH; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Dec; 375(1813):20200071. PubMed ID: 33070721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproductive isolation among allopatric Drosophila montana populations.
    Jennings JH; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3095-108. PubMed ID: 25302639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual and postmating reproductive isolation between allopatric Drosophila montana populations suggest speciation potential.
    Jennings JH; Mazzi D; Ritchie MG; Hoikkala A
    BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Mar; 11():68. PubMed ID: 21396136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple Genes Cause Postmating Prezygotic Reproductive Isolation in the Drosophila virilis Group.
    Ahmed-Braimah YH
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Dec; 6(12):4067-4076. PubMed ID: 27729433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproductive Isolation through Experimental Manipulation of Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Syed ZA; Chatterjee M; Samant MA; Prasad NG
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3330. PubMed ID: 28611437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Rate of Evolution of Postmating-Prezygotic Reproductive Isolation in Drosophila.
    Turissini DA; McGirr JA; Patel SS; David JR; Matute DR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Feb; 35(2):312-334. PubMed ID: 29048573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postmating sexual selection: allopatric evolution of sperm competition mechanisms and genital morphology in calopterygid damselflies (Insecta: Odonata).
    Cordero Rivera A; Andrés JA; Córdoba-Aguilar A; Utzeri C
    Evolution; 2004 Feb; 58(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 15068351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cryptic male mate choice for high-quality females reduces male postcopulatory success in future matings.
    Anastasio OE; Sinclair CS; Pischedda A
    Evolution; 2023 Jun; 77(6):1396-1407. PubMed ID: 37073992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Divergent evolutionary trajectories shape the postmating transcriptional profiles of conspecifically and heterospecifically mated cactophilic Drosophila females.
    Diaz F; Allan CW; Chen X; Coleman JM; Bono JM; Matzkin LM
    Commun Biol; 2022 Aug; 5(1):842. PubMed ID: 35986208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strength of sexual and postmating prezygotic barriers varies between sympatric populations with different histories and species abundances.
    Poikela N; Kinnunen J; Wurdack M; Kauranen H; Schmitt T; Kankare M; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2019 Jun; 73(6):1182-1199. PubMed ID: 30957216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid diversification of sperm precedence traits and processes among three sibling Drosophila species.
    Manier MK; Belote JM; Berben KS; Lüpold S; Ala-Honkola O; Collins WF; Pitnick S
    Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2348-62. PubMed ID: 23888856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sperm competition games: sperm selection by females.
    Ball MA; Parker GA
    J Theor Biol; 2003 Sep; 224(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 12900202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila.
    Price CS
    Nature; 1997 Aug; 388(6643):663-6. PubMed ID: 9262398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sperm competition experiments reveal low prezygotic postmating isolation between parasitic and nonparasitic lamprey ecotypes.
    Decanter N; Normand R; Souissi A; Labbé C; Edeline E; Evanno G
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e9970. PubMed ID: 37021081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in
    Davis JS; Castillo DM; Moyle LC
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Jan; 7(2):507-515. PubMed ID: 28116047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Condition-dependent interaction between mating success and competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.
    De Nardo AN; Roy J; Sbilordo SH; Lüpold S
    Evolution; 2021 Aug; 75(8):2014-2026. PubMed ID: 33834478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.