These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27088302)

  • 21. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for RNA-ligand complexes.
    Jiang D; Du H; Zhao H; Deng Y; Wu Z; Wang J; Zeng Y; Zhang H; Wang X; Wang E; Hou T; Hsieh CY
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 Mar; 26(13):10323-10335. PubMed ID: 38501198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking.
    Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Pan P; Li Y; Li D; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Aug; 18(32):22129-39. PubMed ID: 27444142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Binding free energy estimation for protein-ligand complex based on MM-PBSA with various partial charge models.
    Fu T; Jin Z; Xiu Z; Li G
    Curr Pharm Des; 2013; 19(12):2293-307. PubMed ID: 23082979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities.
    Gilson MK; Zhou HX
    Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct; 2007; 36():21-42. PubMed ID: 17201676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accommodating protein flexibility for structure-based drug design.
    Lin JH
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2011; 11(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 20939792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.
    Pearlman DA; Rao BG; Charifson P
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A decoy set for the thermostable subdomain from chicken villin headpiece, comparison of different free energy estimators.
    Fogolari F; Tosatto SC; Colombo G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6():301. PubMed ID: 16354298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. BgN-Score and BsN-Score: bagging and boosting based ensemble neural networks scoring functions for accurate binding affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S8. PubMed ID: 25734685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Comparative Linear Interaction Energy and MM/PBSA Study on SIRT1-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculation.
    Rifai EA; van Dijk M; Vermeulen NPE; Yanuar A; Geerke DP
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Sep; 59(9):4018-4033. PubMed ID: 31461271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Density functional theory calculations on entire proteins for free energies of binding: application to a model polar binding site.
    Fox SJ; Dziedzic J; Fox T; Tautermann CS; Skylaris CK
    Proteins; 2014 Dec; 82(12):3335-46. PubMed ID: 25212393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of the binding energies of testosterone, 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone, androstenedione and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate with an antitestosterone antibody.
    Nordman N; Valjakka J; Peräkylä M
    Proteins; 2003 Jan; 50(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 12471606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Importance of ligand reorganization free energy in protein-ligand binding-affinity prediction.
    Yang CY; Sun H; Chen J; Nikolovska-Coleska Z; Wang S
    J Am Chem Soc; 2009 Sep; 131(38):13709-21. PubMed ID: 19736924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. HotLig: a molecular surface-directed approach to scoring protein-ligand interactions.
    Wang SH; Wu YT; Kuo SC; Yu J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):2181-95. PubMed ID: 23862697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mapping the binding site of a large set of quinazoline type EGF-R inhibitors using molecular field analyses and molecular docking studies.
    Hou T; Zhu L; Chen L; Xu X
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(1):273-87. PubMed ID: 12546563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Case-specific performance of MM-PBSA, MM-GBSA, and SIE in virtual screening.
    Virtanen SI; Niinivehmas SP; Pentikäinen OT
    J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Nov; 62():303-318. PubMed ID: 26550792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimating protein-ligand binding free energy: atomic solvation parameters for partition coefficient and solvation free energy calculation.
    Pei J; Wang Q; Zhou J; Lai L
    Proteins; 2004 Dec; 57(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 15390269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Molecular insight into the interaction between IFABP and PA by using MM-PBSA and alanine scanning methods.
    Zou H; Luo C; Zheng S; Luo X; Zhu W; Chen K; Shen J; Jiang H
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 Aug; 111(30):9104-13. PubMed ID: 17602517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Absolute binding free energy calculations: on the accuracy of computational scoring of protein-ligand interactions.
    Singh N; Warshel A
    Proteins; 2010 May; 78(7):1705-23. PubMed ID: 20186976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Comparative Assessment of Predictive Accuracies of Conventional and Machine Learning Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(2):335-47. PubMed ID: 26357221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.