These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2708942)

  • 1. A test of the melioration theory of matching.
    Williams BA; Royalty P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Apr; 15(2):99-113. PubMed ID: 2708942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matching and maximizing with concurrent ratio-interval schedules.
    Green L; Rachlin H; Hanson J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Nov; 40(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 6655424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deviations from matching as a measure of preference for alternatives in pigeons.
    Leigland SM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jul; 32(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 490100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Successive independence and behavioral contrast in a closed economy.
    White KG; Alsop B; McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 1402604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative and absolute reinforcement frequency as determinants of choice in concurrent variable interval schedules.
    Shah K; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1991 Feb; 43(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 2017573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrete-trial vs. continuous free-operant procedures in assessing whether reinforcement context affects reinforcement value.
    McDevitt MA; Bell MC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):376-83. PubMed ID: 18054442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preference for conditioned reinforcement.
    Williams BA; Dunn R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan; 55(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 2002301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resistance to change within heterogeneous response sequences.
    Reid AK
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):293-311. PubMed ID: 19594277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?
    Nevin JA; Tota ME; Torquato RD; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 2341820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace.
    Pearce JM; Redhead ES; George DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 11987874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Matching and maximizing with variable-time schedules.
    DeCarlo LT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 Jan; 43(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 3981085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of amount of training per reversal on successive reversals of a color discrimination.
    Beale IL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 Nov; 14(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 5491010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feature-positive and feature-negative learning in the rhesus monkey and pigeon.
    Pace GM; McCoy DF; Nallan GB
    Am J Psychol; 1980 Sep; 93(3):409-27. PubMed ID: 7212125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observing responses maintained by conditional discriminative stimuli.
    Ohta A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Nov; 48(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 3430109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some effects of overall rate of earning reinforcers on run lengths and visit durations.
    Macdonall JS
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jul; 73(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16530983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of terminal-link stimuli in concurrent-chain schedules: revisited using a behavioral-history procedure.
    Ono K; Yamagishi N; Aotsuka T; Hojo R; Nogawa Y
    Behav Processes; 2005 Aug; 70(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15967283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the dynamics of choice.
    Baum WM; Davison M
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 19429211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Timescale invariance and Weber's law in choice.
    Jozefowiez J; Cerutti DT; Staddon JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 16834491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.