These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27089534)

  • 1. Don't be fooled-A no-observed-effect concentration is no substitute for a poor concentration-response experiment.
    Fox DR; Landis WG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2141-8. PubMed ID: 27089534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Introducing the No-Significant-Effect Concentration.
    Fisher R; Fox DR
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2023 Sep; 42(9):2019-2028. PubMed ID: 36942362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comment on ET&C perspectives, November 2015-A holistic view.
    Fox DR; Landis WG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1337-9. PubMed ID: 27216838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology.
    Fox DR
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Feb; 73(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 19836077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NOEC and LOEC as merely concessive expedients: two unambiguous alternatives and some criteria to maximize the efficiency of dose-response experimental designs.
    Murado MA; Prieto MA
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Sep; 461-462():576-86. PubMed ID: 23756217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical analysis of regulatory ecotoxicity tests.
    Isnard P; Flammarion P; Roman G; Babut M; Bastien P; Bintein S; Esserméant L; Férard JF; Gallotti-Schmitt S; Saouter E; Saroli M; Thiébaud H; Tomassone R; Vindimian E
    Chemosphere; 2001 Nov; 45(4-5):659-69. PubMed ID: 11680762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time to get off the fence: the need for definitive international guidance on statistical analysis of ecotoxicity data.
    van Dam RA; Harford AJ; Warne MS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 22308052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The drive to ban the NOEC/LOEC in favor of ECx is misguided and misinformed.
    Green JW; Springer TA; Staveley JP
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 22991182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new perspective on the Dunnett procedure: filling the gap between NOEC/LOEC and ECx concepts.
    Delignette-Muller ML; Forfait C; Billoir E; Charles S
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Dec; 30(12):2888-91. PubMed ID: 21932292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Generalized concentration addition approach for predicting mixture toxicity.
    Tanaka Y; Tada M
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Jan; 36(1):265-275. PubMed ID: 27216969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the Choice of NOEC or EC10 Affect the Hazardous Concentration for 5% of the Species?
    Iwasaki Y; Kotani K; Kashiwada S; Masunaga S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 49(15):9326-30. PubMed ID: 26167813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behaviour of damselfly larvae (Enallagma cyathigerum) (Insecta, Odonata) after long-term exposure to PFOS.
    Van Gossum H; Bots J; Snijkers T; Meyer J; Van Wassenbergh S; De Coen W; De Bruyn L
    Environ Pollut; 2009 Apr; 157(4):1332-6. PubMed ID: 19110351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation and comparison of the relationship between NOEC and EC10 or EC20 values in chronic Daphnia toxicity testing.
    Beasley A; Belanger SE; Brill JL; Otter RR
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Oct; 34(10):2378-84. PubMed ID: 26033640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of the Closure Principle Computational Approach Test to Assess Ecotoxicological Field Studies: Comparative Analysis Using Earthworm Field Test Abundance Data.
    Daniels B; Roß-Nickoll M; Jänsch S; Pieper S; Römbke J; Scholz-Starke B; Ottermanns R
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Jun; 40(6):1750-1760. PubMed ID: 33590918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What to do with NOECS/NOELS--prohibition or innovation?
    Fox DR; Billoir E; Charles S; Delignette-Muller ML; Lopes C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):764-6. PubMed ID: 22987523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comment on Fox et al. (2012): What to do with NOECs/NOELs.
    Landis WG
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):766-7. PubMed ID: 22987524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the integration of hormesis and essentiality into ecotoxicology now opening Pandora's Box?
    Kefford BJ; Zalizniak L; Warne MS; Nugegoda D
    Environ Pollut; 2008 Feb; 151(3):516-23. PubMed ID: 17559995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. More noise does not mean more precision: A review of Aldenberg and Rorije (2013).
    Fox DR
    Altern Lab Anim; 2015 Sep; 43(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 26375888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of fish early life stage tests for predicting reproductive and longer-term toxicity from plant protection product active substances.
    Wheeler JR; Maynard SK; Crane M
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Aug; 33(8):1874-8. PubMed ID: 24799351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The implications of hormesis to ecotoxicology and ecological risk assessment.
    Chapman PM
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2001 Oct; 20(10):499-505. PubMed ID: 11858510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.