These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27091355)

  • 1. Using machine learning to identify structural breaks in single-group interrupted time series designs.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 22(6):851-855. PubMed ID: 27091355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using machine learning to evaluate treatment effects in multiple-group interrupted time series analysis.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Aug; 24(4):740-744. PubMed ID: 29888469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges to validity in single-group interrupted time series analysis.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 23(2):413-418. PubMed ID: 27630090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using permutation tests to enhance causal inference in interrupted time series analysis.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Jun; 24(3):496-501. PubMed ID: 29460383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using forecast modelling to evaluate treatment effects in single-group interrupted time series analysis.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Aug; 24(4):695-700. PubMed ID: 29749091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A matching framework to improve causal inference in interrupted time-series analysis.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 24(2):408-415. PubMed ID: 29266646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining synthetic controls and interrupted time series analysis to improve causal inference in program evaluation.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 24(2):447-453. PubMed ID: 29356225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using randomization tests to assess treatment effects in multiple-group interrupted time series analysis.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Feb; 25(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 30003627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using group-based trajectory modelling to enhance causal inference in interrupted time series analysis.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Jun; 24(3):502-507. PubMed ID: 29658192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Persistent threats to validity in single-group interrupted time series analysis with a cross over design.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 23(2):419-425. PubMed ID: 27804216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining machine learning and matching techniques to improve causal inference in program evaluation.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 22(6):864-870. PubMed ID: 27353301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using machine learning to assess covariate balance in matching studies.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 22(6):844-850. PubMed ID: 27004916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combining machine learning and propensity score weighting to estimate causal effects in multivalued treatments.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 22(6):871-881. PubMed ID: 27421786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using machine learning to model dose-response relationships.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR; Nallamothu BK
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 22(6):856-863. PubMed ID: 27240883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interrupted time-series analysis: studying trends in neurosurgery.
    Wong RH; Smieliauskas F; Pan IW; Lam SK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E6. PubMed ID: 26621420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can synthetic controls improve causal inference in interrupted time series evaluations of public health interventions?
    Degli Esposti M; Spreckelsen T; Gasparrini A; Wiebe DJ; Bonander C; Yakubovich AR; Humphreys DK
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 49(6):2010-2020. PubMed ID: 33005920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological considerations for interrupted time series analysis in radiation epidemiology: an overview.
    Wollschläger D; Auvinen A; Blettner M; Zeeb H
    J Radiol Prot; 2021 Sep; 41(4):. PubMed ID: 34261051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Visual and Statistical Analysis in Single-Case Studies Using Published Studies.
    Harrington M; Velicer WF
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(2):162-83. PubMed ID: 26609876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The design of interrupted time series and its analytic methods].
    Yu SC; Wang QQ; Mao F; Li Y; Shi JX; Zhang MH; Long XJ; Jin CG
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 53(8):858-864. PubMed ID: 31378050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of controls in interrupted time series studies of public health interventions.
    Lopez Bernal J; Cummins S; Gasparrini A
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 47(6):2082-2093. PubMed ID: 29982445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.