These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27091565)

  • 1. Goal relevance influences performance monitoring at the level of the FRN and P3 components.
    Walentowska W; Moors A; Paul K; Pourtois G
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1020-33. PubMed ID: 27091565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neurophysiological evidence for evaluative feedback processing depending on goal relevance.
    Severo MC; Paul K; Walentowska W; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jul; 215():116857. PubMed ID: 32304885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Goal impact influences the evaluative component of performance monitoring: Evidence from ERPs.
    Severo MC; Walentowska W; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Oct; 129():90-102. PubMed ID: 28844662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When the outcome is different than expected: Subjective expectancy shapes reward prediction error at the FRN level.
    Walentowska W; Severo MC; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Dec; 56(12):e13456. PubMed ID: 31403188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Goals matter: Amplification of the motivational significance of the feedback when goal impact is increased.
    Severo MC; Walentowska W; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Dec; 128():56-72. PubMed ID: 30449654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relevance and uncertainty jointly influence reward anticipation at the level of the SPN ERP component.
    Walentowska W; Paul K; Severo MC; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):287-297. PubMed ID: 29129655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disentangling performance-monitoring signals encoded in feedback-related EEG dynamics.
    Kirsch F; Kirschner H; Fischer AG; Klein TA; Ullsperger M
    Neuroimage; 2022 Aug; 257():119322. PubMed ID: 35577025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expectancy affects the feedback-related negativity (FRN) for delayed feedback in probabilistic learning.
    Weismüller B; Bellebaum C
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Nov; 53(11):1739-1750. PubMed ID: 27565454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Event-related components of the punishment and reward sensitivity.
    De Pascalis V; Varriale V; D'Antuono L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 121(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 19900840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Valence-separated representation of reward prediction error in feedback-related negativity and positivity.
    Bai Y; Katahira K; Ohira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Feb; 26(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 25634316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Give it a second try? The influence of feedback and performance in the decision of reattempting.
    Chung WY; Darriba Á; Yeung N; Waszak F
    Cognition; 2024 Jul; 248():105803. PubMed ID: 38703619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing.
    Glazer JE; Kelley NJ; Pornpattananangkul N; Mittal VA; Nusslock R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):184-202. PubMed ID: 29454641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mood congruent tuning of reward expectation in positive mood: evidence from FRN and theta modulations.
    Paul K; Pourtois G
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 May; 12(5):765-774. PubMed ID: 28199707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The feedback-related negativity is modulated by feedback probability in observational learning.
    Kobza S; Thoma P; Daum I; Bellebaum C
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Dec; 225(2):396-404. PubMed ID: 21846482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations.
    Bellebaum C; Polezzi D; Daum I
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3343-50. PubMed ID: 20655319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Representing the consequences of our actions trial by trial: Complex and flexible encoding of feedback valence and magnitude.
    Padrón I; Fernández-Rey J; Acuña C; Pardo-Vazquez JL
    Neuroscience; 2016 Oct; 333():264-76. PubMed ID: 27457038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From Positivity to Negativity Bias: Ambiguity Affects the Neurophysiological Signatures of Feedback Processing.
    Gibbons H; Schnuerch R; Stahl J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 28(4):542-57. PubMed ID: 26765948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal prediction modulates the evaluative processing of "good" action feedback: An electrophysiological study.
    Kimura K; Kimura M; Iwaki S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Oct; 53(10):1552-9. PubMed ID: 27412662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task.
    Krugliakova E; Klucharev V; Fedele T; Gorin A; Kuznetsova A; Shestakova A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 236(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 29196772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. It was not MY fault: event-related brain potentials in active and observational learning from feedback.
    Bellebaum C; Kobza S; Thiele S; Daum I
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Dec; 20(12):2874-83. PubMed ID: 20308202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.