These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27092215)

  • 1. In vitro investigation of the cleaning efficacy, shaping ability, preparation time and file deformation of continuous rotary, reciprocating rotary and manual instrumentations in primary molars.
    Ramazani N; Mohammadi A; Amirabadi F; Ramazani M; Ehsani F
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2016; 10(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 27092215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shaping Ability of Reciproc R25 File and Mtwo System Used in Continuous and Reciprocating Motion.
    Campanella V; Gianni L; Libonati A; Gallusi G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Feb; 21(2):171-177. PubMed ID: 32381823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals.
    Azar MR; Mokhtare M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):363. PubMed ID: 21891918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Cleaning Efficacy and Instrumentation Time in Primary Molars: Mtwo Rotary Instruments vs. Hand K-Files.
    Ramezanali F; Afkhami F; Soleimani A; Kharrazifard MJ; Rafiee F
    Iran Endod J; 2015; 10(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 26523138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and Pro Taper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth.
    Azar MR; Safi L; Nikaein A
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Mar; 9(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 22623929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shaping ability of the conventional nickel-titanium and reciprocating nickel-titanium file systems: a comparative study using micro-computed tomography.
    Hwang YH; Bae KS; Baek SH; Kum KY; Lee W; Shon WJ; Chang SW
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1186-9. PubMed ID: 25069930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning efficacy of manual instrumentation, rotary systems and reciprocating systems in primary teeth: an in vitro study.
    Katge F; Patil D; Poojari M; Pimpale J; Shitoot A; Rusawat B
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 25231039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT.
    Musale PK; Mujawar SA
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2014 Apr; 15(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 23893606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shaping ability of rotary or reciprocating systems for oval root canal preparation: a micro-computed tomography study.
    Espir CG; Nascimento-Mendes CA; Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM; Cavenago BC; Hungaro Duarte MA; Tanomaru-Filho M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):3189-3194. PubMed ID: 29525921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Effect of Different Root Canal Preparation Techniques in Primary Teeth Using CBCT.
    Shaikh SM; Goswami M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2018; 42(4):250-255. PubMed ID: 29750624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shaping ability of hand, rotary and reciprocating files in primary teeth: a micro-CT study in vitro.
    Barasuol JC; Alcalde MP; Bortoluzzi EA; Duarte MAH; Cardoso M; Bolan M
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2021 Apr; 22(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 32346833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ex Vivo Comparison of Mtwo and RaCe Rotary File Systems in Root Canal Deviation: One File Only versus the Conventional Method.
    Aminsobhani M; Razmi H; Nozari S
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Jul; 12(7):469-77. PubMed ID: 26877736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems.
    Dincer AN; Er O; Canakci BC
    Int Endod J; 2015 Dec; 48(12):1194-8. PubMed ID: 25557631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
    Gergi R; Osta N; Bourbouze G; Zgheib C; Arbab-Chirani R; Naaman A
    Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 24717063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shaping ability of single-file reciprocating and heat-treated multifile rotary systems: a micro-CT study.
    Marceliano-Alves MF; Sousa-Neto MD; Fidel SR; Steier L; Robinson JP; Pécora JD; Versiani MA
    Int Endod J; 2015 Dec; 48(12):1129-36. PubMed ID: 25400256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Root canal cleaning efficacy of rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molars.
    Nazari Moghaddam K; Mehran M; Farajian Zadeh H
    Iran Endod J; 2009; 4(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 23940486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of instrumentation timing and cleaning efficacy in extracted primary molars using manual and NiTi rotary technique - Invitro study.
    Mehlawat R; Kapoor R; Gandhi K; Kumar D; Malhotra R; Ahuja S
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2019; 9(2):151-155. PubMed ID: 30963021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of cleaning Efficacy and Instrumentation Time between Rotary and Manual Instrumentation Techniques in Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study.
    Katge F; Chimata VK; Poojari M; Shetty S; Rusawat B
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 27365932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of root canal preparations of maxillary first molars with self-adjusting file, reciproc single file, and revo-s rotary file: A micro-computed tomography study.
    Ahmetoglu F; Keles A; Simsek N; Ocak MS; Yologlu S
    Scanning; 2015; 37(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 25737430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.