172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27092357)
1. Immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: A cone beam computed tomography study.
Chrcanovic BR; de Carvalho Machado V; Gjelvold B
Quintessence Int; 2016; 47(6):505-14. PubMed ID: 27092357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study.
Lin MH; Mau LP; Cochran DL; Shieh YS; Huang PH; Huang RY
J Dent; 2014 Mar; 42(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 24394585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study.
Froum S; Casanova L; Byrne S; Cho SC
J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 20809864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed Tomography for the Assessment of the Potential Risk After Implant Placement in Fresh Extraction Sites in the Posterior Mandible.
Haj Yahya B; Chaushu G; Hamzani Y
J Oral Implantol; 2021 Feb; 47(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 32662837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immediate implant placement in the anterior mandible: a cone beam computed tomography study.
Kanewoff E; Alhallak R; de Carvalho Machado V; Chrcanovic BR
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):393. PubMed ID: 38539122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomic considerations for immediate implant placement in the mandibular molar region: a cross-sectional study using cone-beam computed tomography.
Ho JY; Ngeow WC; Lim D; Wong CS
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2022; 81(3):732-738. PubMed ID: 34184752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relevant factors of posterior mandible lingual plate perforation during immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study using CBCT.
Sun Y; Hu S; Xie Z; Zhou Y
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):76. PubMed ID: 36747164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of lingual plate perforation for virtual immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: A computer simulation study.
Huang RY; Cochran DL; Cheng WC; Lin MH; Fan WH; Sung CE; Mau LP; Huang PH; Shieh YS
J Am Dent Assoc; 2015 Oct; 146(10):735-42. PubMed ID: 26409983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery.
de Souza LA; Souza Picorelli Assis NM; Ribeiro RA; Pires Carvalho AC; Devito KL
Ann Anat; 2016 May; 205():53-9. PubMed ID: 26851559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of anatomic variations of mandibular lingual concavities from cone beam computed tomography scans in a Malaysian population.
Tan WY; Ng JZL; Ajit Bapat R; Vijaykumar Chaubal T; Kishor Kanneppedy S
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):766.e1-766.e8. PubMed ID: 33752904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography.
Chan HL; Benavides E; Yeh CY; Fu JH; Rudek IE; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 20653440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-Dimensional Alveolar Bone Assessment of Mandibular First Molars with Implications for Immediate Implant Placement.
Padhye NM; Shirsekar VU; Bhatavadekar NB
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2020; 40(4):e163-e167. PubMed ID: 32559042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative and qualitative 3D analysis of mandibular lingual concavities: Implications for dental implant planning in the posterior mandible.
Alqutaibi AY; Alghauli MA; Aboalrejal A; Mulla AK; Almohammadi AA; Aljayyar AW; Alharbi SO; Almuzaini ES; Alsaeedi AK; Arabi LF; Alhajj MN; Halboub E
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Feb; 10(1):e858. PubMed ID: 38345362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional alveolar bone assessment of mandibular molars for immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study.
Chen H; Wang W; Gu X
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):478. PubMed ID: 34579702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1--analysis of dentate sites.
Braut V; Bornstein MM; Lauber R; Buser D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Apr; 32(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 22292147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Bone Width for Implants in the Posterior Mandible.
Block MS; Scoggin ZD; Yu Q
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 73(9):1715-22. PubMed ID: 25889373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of Lingual Concavities in Submandibular Fossa Region in Patients requiring Dental Implants-A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Rajput BS; Merita S; Parihar AS; Vyas T; Kaur P; Chansoria S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1329-1333. PubMed ID: 30602636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential Circumferential Bone Engagement following Tooth Extraction in the Posterior Mandible: Computed Tomography Assessment.
Hamzani Y; Yassien E; Moskovich L; Becker T; Chaushu G; Haj Yahya B
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Aug; 57(9):. PubMed ID: 34577797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
