These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27092468)

  • 1. Encoding and verification of a computer-interpretable guideline: a case study of pressure-ulcer management.
    Kim HY; Park HA; Cho I; Kim J; Lee J
    Health Inf Manag; 2015; 44(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 27092468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Encoding a clinical practice guideline using guideline interchange format: a case study of a depression screening and management guideline.
    Choi J; Currie LM; Wang D; Bakken S
    Int J Med Inform; 2007 Oct; 76 Suppl 2():S302-7. PubMed ID: 17600762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Computer-Interpretable Guideline for COVID-19: Rapid Development and Dissemination.
    Nan S; Tang T; Feng H; Wang Y; Li M; Lu X; Duan H
    JMIR Med Inform; 2020 Oct; 8(10):e21628. PubMed ID: 32931443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. META-GLARE: A meta-system for defining your own computer interpretable guideline system-Architecture and acquisition.
    Bottrighi A; Terenziani P
    Artif Intell Med; 2016 Sep; 72():22-41. PubMed ID: 27664506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A pattern-based analysis of clinical computer-interpretable guideline modeling languages.
    Mulyar N; van der Aalst WM; Peleg M
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2007; 14(6):781-7. PubMed ID: 17712087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review.
    Peleg M
    J Biomed Inform; 2013 Aug; 46(4):744-63. PubMed ID: 23806274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Creating Shareable Clinical Decision Support Rules for a Pharmacogenomics Clinical Guideline Using Structured Knowledge Representation.
    Linan MK; Sottara D; Freimuth RR
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2015; 2015():1985-94. PubMed ID: 26958298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A formal approach to the analysis of clinical computer-interpretable guideline modeling languages.
    Grando MA; Glasspool D; Fox J
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jan; 54(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21788121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of primary care expert and computer-interpretable depression screening guideline recommendations.
    Choi J; Bakken S
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():887. PubMed ID: 17238506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. META-GLARE: a shell for CIG systems.
    Bottrighi A; Rubrichi S; Terenziani P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():218-20. PubMed ID: 25991134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. Where are we and where are we going ?
    Sonnenberg FA; Hagerty CG
    Yearb Med Inform; 2006; ():145-58. PubMed ID: 17051309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Creation of a gold standard for validation of a computer-interpretable depression screening guideline.
    Choi J; Bakken S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():95-9. PubMed ID: 17102225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The InterMed approach to sharable computer-interpretable guidelines: a review.
    Peleg M; Boxwala AA; Tu S; Zeng Q; Ogunyemi O; Wang D; Patel VL; Greenes RA; Shortliffe EH
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2004; 11(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14527977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Executing clinical practice guidelines using the SAGE execution engine.
    Ram P; Berg D; Tu S; Mansfield G; Ye Q; Abarbanel R; Beard N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):251-5. PubMed ID: 15360813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of declarative statements in creating and maintaining computer-interpretable knowledge bases for guideline-based care.
    Tu SW; Hrabak KM; Campbell JR; Glasgow J; Nyman MA; McClure R; McClay J; Abarbanel R; Mansfield JG; Martins SM; Goldstein MK; Musen MA
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():784-8. PubMed ID: 17238448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The SAGE guideline modeling: motivation and methodology.
    Tu SW; Campbell J; Musen MA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 101():167-71. PubMed ID: 15537222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design patterns for clinical guidelines.
    Peleg M; Tu SW
    Artif Intell Med; 2009 Sep; 47(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 19500956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach.
    Peleg M; Tu S; Bury J; Ciccarese P; Fox J; Greenes RA; Hall R; Johnson PD; Jones N; Kumar A; Miksch S; Quaglini S; Seyfang A; Shortliffe EH; Stefanelli M
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2003; 10(1):52-68. PubMed ID: 12509357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated generation of patient-tailored electronic care pathways by translating computer-interpretable guidelines into hierarchical task networks.
    González-Ferrer A; ten Teije A; Fdez-Olivares J; Milian K
    Artif Intell Med; 2013 Feb; 57(2):91-109. PubMed ID: 23177024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a computer-interpretable clinical guideline model for decision support in the differential diagnosis of hyponatremia.
    González-Ferrer A; Valcárcel MÁ; Cuesta M; Cháfer J; Runkle I
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jul; 103():55-64. PubMed ID: 28551002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.