BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27092659)

  • 1. Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Diagnostic Performance and Prognostic Value of PET/MR Imaging.
    Lee DH; Lee JM; Hur BY; Joo I; Yi NJ; Suh KS; Kang KW; Han JK
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):782-92. PubMed ID: 27092659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of Imaging to Predict Complete Response of Colorectal Liver Metastases after Chemotherapy: MR Imaging versus CT Imaging.
    Park MJ; Hong N; Han K; Kim MJ; Lee YJ; Park YS; Rha SE; Park S; Lee WJ; Park SH; Lee CH; Nam CM; An C; Kim HJ; Kim H; Park MS
    Radiology; 2017 Aug; 284(2):423-431. PubMed ID: 28327002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Value of retrospective fusion of PET and MR images in detection of hepatic metastases: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.
    Donati OF; Hany TF; Reiner CS; von Schulthess GK; Marincek B; Seifert B; Weishaupt D
    J Nucl Med; 2010 May; 51(5):692-9. PubMed ID: 20395324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of colorectal liver metastases.
    Seo HJ; Kim MJ; Lee JD; Chung WS; Kim YE
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Sep; 46(9):548-55. PubMed ID: 21577131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incremental value of liver MR imaging in patients with potentially curable colorectal hepatic metastasis detected at CT: a prospective comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging, and a combination of both MR techniques.
    Kim HJ; Lee SS; Byun JH; Kim JC; Yu CS; Park SH; Kim AY; Ha HK
    Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):712-22. PubMed ID: 25286324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of CE-CT, MRI and FDG PET/CT for detecting colorectal cancer liver metastases in patients considered eligible for hepatic resection and/or local ablation.
    Sivesgaard K; Larsen LP; Sørensen M; Kramer S; Schlander S; Amanavicius N; Bharadwaz A; Tønner Nielsen D; Viborg Mortensen F; Morre Pedersen E
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4735-4747. PubMed ID: 29736846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic Performance of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Liver MR Imaging versus Multidetector CT in the Detection of Dysplastic Nodules and Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kim BR; Lee JM; Lee DH; Yoon JH; Hur BY; Suh KS; Yi NJ; Lee KB; Han JK
    Radiology; 2017 Oct; 285(1):134-146. PubMed ID: 28609205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases with CT, MR imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis of prospective studies including patients who have not previously undergone treatment.
    Niekel MC; Bipat S; Stoker J
    Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):674-84. PubMed ID: 20829538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI versus multidetector CT in the assessment of colorectal liver metastases compared to hepatic resection.
    Granata V; Fusco R; de Lutio di Castelguidone E; Avallone A; Palaia R; Delrio P; Tatangelo F; Botti G; Grassi R; Izzo F; Petrillo A
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):129. PubMed ID: 31340755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer with FDG PET/MR Imaging versus FDG PET/CT Plus Contrast-enhanced Multidetector CT: A Prospective Preliminary Study.
    Joo I; Lee JM; Lee DH; Lee ES; Paeng JC; Lee SJ; Jang JY; Kim SW; Ryu JK; Lee KB
    Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):149-159. PubMed ID: 27556273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/MR Imaging and Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/CT in Terms of Lesion Detection and Radiation Dose in Patients with Breast Cancer.
    Melsaether AN; Raad RA; Pujara AC; Ponzo FD; Pysarenko KM; Jhaveri K; Babb JS; Sigmund EE; Kim SG; Moy LA
    Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 27023002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of colo-rectal liver metastases: prospective comparison of contrast enhanced US, multidetector CT, PET/CT, and 1.5 Tesla MR with extracellular and reticulo-endothelial cell specific contrast agents.
    Mainenti PP; Mancini M; Mainolfi C; Camera L; Maurea S; Manchia A; Tanga M; Persico F; Addeo P; D'Antonio D; Speranza A; Bucci L; Persico G; Pace L; Salvatore M
    Abdom Imaging; 2010 Oct; 35(5):511-21. PubMed ID: 19562412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pulmonary lesion assessment: comparison of whole-body hybrid MR/PET and PET/CT imaging--pilot study.
    Schwenzer NF; Schraml C; Müller M; Brendle C; Sauter A; Spengler W; Pfannenberg AC; Claussen CD; Schmidt H
    Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):551-8. PubMed ID: 22653189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gadopentetate dimeglumine and FDG uptake in liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma as determined with MR imaging and PET.
    van Laarhoven HW; de Geus-Oei LF; Wiering B; Lok J; Rijpkema M; Kaanders JH; Krabbe PF; Ruers T; Punt CJ; van der Kogel AJ; Oyen WJ; Heerschap A
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 16183932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of CT, MRI and PET/CT in patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases: the superiority of MRI.
    Schulz A; Viktil E; Godt JC; Johansen CK; Dormagen JB; Holtedahl JE; Labori KJ; Bach-Gansmo T; Kløw NE
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1040-8. PubMed ID: 26622057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of occult primary tumors in patients with cervical metastases of unknown primary tumors: comparison of (18)F FDG PET/CT with contrast-enhanced CT or CT/MR imaging-prospective study.
    Lee JR; Kim JS; Roh JL; Lee JH; Baek JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 25405771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic MR imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases.
    Asato N; Tsurusaki M; Sofue K; Hieda Y; Katsube T; Kitajima K; Murakami T
    Jpn J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):197-205. PubMed ID: 28251499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging in the detection of HCCs and allocation of transplant recipients on the basis of the Milan criteria and UNOS guidelines: correlation with histopathologic findings.
    Lee DH; Lee JM; Baek JH; Shin CI; Han JK; Choi BI
    Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):149-60. PubMed ID: 25203131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection and Viability of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Multiparametric PET/CT-MRI Study.
    Dunet V; Halkic N; Prior JO; Anaye A; Meuli RA; Sempoux C; Denys A; Schmidt S
    Clin Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 42(4):258-263. PubMed ID: 28166142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical impact of PET/MR imaging in patients with cancer undergoing same-day PET/CT: initial experience in 134 patients--a hypothesis-generating exploratory study.
    Catalano OA; Rosen BR; Sahani DV; Hahn PF; Guimaraes AR; Vangel MG; Nicolai E; Soricelli A; Salvatore M
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):857-69. PubMed ID: 24009348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.