These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27093027)

  • 1. Impact of Noise Reduction Algorithm in Cochlear Implant Processing on Music Enjoyment.
    Kohlberg GD; Mancuso DM; Griffin BM; Spitzer JB; Lalwani AK
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jun; 37(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 27093027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of the Harmonic Series Influences Musical Enjoyment With Cochlear Implants.
    Nemer JS; Kohlberg GD; Mancuso DM; Griffin BM; Certo MV; Chen SY; Chun MB; Spitzer JB; Lalwani AK
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jan; 38(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 27755358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Music Engineering as a Novel Strategy for Enhancing Music Enjoyment in the Cochlear Implant Recipient.
    Kohlberg GD; Mancuso DM; Chari DA; Lalwani AK
    Behav Neurol; 2015; 2015():829680. PubMed ID: 26543322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reverberation time influences musical enjoyment with cochlear implants.
    Certo MV; Kohlberg GD; Chari DA; Mancuso DM; Lalwani AK
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):e46-50. PubMed ID: 25280051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Wright R; Uchanski RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):350-65; quiz 379. PubMed ID: 22533978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Music Is More Enjoyable With Two Ears, Even If One of Them Receives a Degraded Signal Provided By a Cochlear Implant.
    Landsberger DM; Vermeire K; Stupak N; Lavender A; Neukam J; Van de Heyning P; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):476-490. PubMed ID: 31469701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From fragments to the whole: a comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment.
    Alexander AJ; Bartel L; Friesen L; Shipp D; Chen J
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21303594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novel Web-Based Music Re-Engineering Software for Enhancement of Music Enjoyment Among Cochlear Implantees.
    Hwa TP; Tian LL; Caruana F; Chun M; Mancuso D; Cellum IP; Lalwani AK
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Oct; 42(9):1347-1354. PubMed ID: 34224548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Music enjoyment with cochlear implantation.
    Prevoteau C; Chen SY; Lalwani AK
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Oct; 45(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 29519690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Compression on Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Gilbert M; Jiradejvong P; Limb C
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1368-1375. PubMed ID: 30946137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.
    Gfeller K; Jiang D; Oleson JJ; Driscoll V; Olszewski C; Knutson JF; Turner C; Gantz B
    J Music Ther; 2012; 49(1):68-101. PubMed ID: 22803258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Meyer B; Pressnitzer D
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20674733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Music appreciation and music listening in prelingual and postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Moran M; Rousset A; Looi V
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S57-63. PubMed ID: 27045837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forward-Masked Frequency Selectivity Improvements in Simulated and Actual Cochlear Implant Users Using a Preprocessing Algorithm.
    Langner F; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deeper Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Angle Improves Detection of Musical Sound Quality Deterioration Related to Bass Frequency Removal.
    Roy AT; Penninger RT; Pearl MS; Wuerfel W; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Buechner A; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 26669557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
    Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Musical Rehabilitation in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With a Self-administered Software.
    Smith L; Bartel L; Joglekar S; Chen J
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Sep; 38(8):e262-e267. PubMed ID: 28806336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multicentre evaluation of music perception in adult users of Advanced Bionics cochlear implants.
    Adams D; Ajimsha KM; Barberá MT; Gazibegovic D; Gisbert J; Gómez J; Raveh E; Rocca C; Romanet P; Seebens Y; Zarowski A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 24074504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation.
    Looi V; Winter P; Anderson I; Sucher C
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):503-18. PubMed ID: 21689048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.