These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27093307)

  • 1. Fourier Analysis of Noise Characteristics in Cone-Beam Microtomography Laboratory Scanners.
    Jang SY; Kim HK; Youn H; Cho S; Cunningham IA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Jan; 64(1):173-183. PubMed ID: 27093307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of imaging performance in differential phase contrast CT compared with the conventional CT: spectrum of noise equivalent quanta NEQ(k).
    Tang X; Yang Y; Tang S
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4467-82. PubMed ID: 22830779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cascaded systems analysis of noise and detectability in dual-energy cone-beam CT.
    Gang GJ; Zbijewski W; Webster Stayman J; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5145-56. PubMed ID: 22894440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noise Power Characteristics of a Micro-Computed Tomography System.
    Ghani MU; Ren L; Wong M; Li Y; Zheng B; Rong XJ; Yang K; Liu H
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017 Jan; 41(1):82-89. PubMed ID: 27680419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mobile C-Arm with a CMOS detector: Technical assessment of fluoroscopy and Cone-Beam CT imaging performance.
    Sheth NM; Zbijewski W; Jacobson MW; Abiola G; Kleinszig G; Vogt S; Soellradl S; Bialkowski J; Anderson WS; Weiss CR; Osgood GM; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5420-5436. PubMed ID: 30339271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task-based modeling and optimization of a cone-beam CT scanner for musculoskeletal imaging.
    Prakash P; Zbijewski W; Gang GJ; Ding Y; Stayman JW; Yorkston J; Carrino JA; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5612-29. PubMed ID: 21992379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
    Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward standardized quantitative image quality (IQ) assessment in computed tomography (CT): A comprehensive framework for automated and comparative IQ analysis based on ICRU Report 87.
    Pahn G; Skornitzke S; Schlemmer HP; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):104-15. PubMed ID: 26520485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fundamental relationship between the noise properties of grating-based differential phase contrast CT and absorption CT: theoretical framework using a cascaded system model and experimental validation.
    Li K; Bevins N; Zambelli J; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021908. PubMed ID: 23387756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cascaded systems analysis of the 3D noise transfer characteristics of flat-panel cone-beam CT.
    Tward DJ; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5510-29. PubMed ID: 19175110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of the noise power spectrum in modern diagnostic MDCT: part I. Measurement of noise power spectra and noise equivalent quanta.
    Boedeker KL; Cooper VN; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4027-46. PubMed ID: 17664593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Signal detection and location-dependent noise in cone-beam computed tomography using the spatial definition of the Hotelling SNR.
    Brunner CC; Abboud SF; Hoeschen C; Kyprianou IS
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3214-28. PubMed ID: 22755705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image performance evaluation of a cone beam O-arm imaging system.
    Zhang J; Zhang D
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2013; 21(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 24004867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and validation of a hybrid simulation technique for cone beam CT: application to an oral imaging system.
    Zhang G; Pauwels R; Marshall N; Shaheen E; Nuyts J; Jacobs R; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(18):5823-43. PubMed ID: 21846936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flat panel detector-based cone beam computed tomography with a circle-plus-two-arcs data acquisition orbit: preliminary phantom study.
    Ning R; Tang X; Conover D; Yu R
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1694-705. PubMed ID: 12906186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of three dead detector correction methods for cone-beam computed tomography.
    Nelms DW; Shukla HI; Nixon E; Bayouth JE; Flynn RT
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4569-76. PubMed ID: 19928088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study on image quality provided by a kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography.
    Garayoa J; Castro P
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 14(1):3888. PubMed ID: 23318380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cascaded systems analysis of noise reduction algorithms in dual-energy imaging.
    Richard S; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):586-601. PubMed ID: 18383680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.