BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27094282)

  • 1. In silico Identification and Characterization of Protein-Ligand Binding Sites.
    Roche DB; McGuffin LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1414():1-21. PubMed ID: 27094282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toolbox for Protein Structure Prediction.
    Roche DB; McGuffin LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1369():363-77. PubMed ID: 26519323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proteins and Their Interacting Partners: An Introduction to Protein-Ligand Binding Site Prediction Methods with a Focus on FunFOLD3.
    Brackenridge DA; McGuffin LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2365():43-58. PubMed ID: 34432238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FunFOLD: an improved automated method for the prediction of ligand binding residues using 3D models of proteins.
    Roche DB; Tetchner SJ; McGuffin LJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 May; 12():160. PubMed ID: 21575183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO) complementing the critical assessment of structure prediction in CASP12.
    Haas J; Barbato A; Behringer D; Studer G; Roth S; Bertoni M; Mostaguir K; Gumienny R; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):387-398. PubMed ID: 29178137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proteins and Their Interacting Partners: An Introduction to Protein-Ligand Binding Site Prediction Methods.
    Roche DB; Brackenridge DA; McGuffin LJ
    Int J Mol Sci; 2015 Dec; 16(12):29829-42. PubMed ID: 26694353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The FunFOLD2 server for the prediction of protein-ligand interactions.
    Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Jul; 41(Web Server issue):W303-7. PubMed ID: 23761453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The IntFOLD server: an integrated web resource for protein fold recognition, 3D model quality assessment, intrinsic disorder prediction, domain prediction and ligand binding site prediction.
    Roche DB; Buenavista MT; Tetchner SJ; McGuffin LJ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Jul; 39(Web Server issue):W171-6. PubMed ID: 21459847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IntFOLD: an integrated server for modelling protein structures and functions from amino acid sequences.
    McGuffin LJ; Atkins JD; Salehe BR; Shuid AN; Roche DB
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Jul; 43(W1):W169-73. PubMed ID: 25820431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FunFOLDQA: a quality assessment tool for protein-ligand binding site residue predictions.
    Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e38219. PubMed ID: 22666491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Introducing "best single template" models as reference baseline for the Continuous Automated Model Evaluation (CAMEO).
    Haas J; Gumienny R; Barbato A; Ackermann F; Tauriello G; Bertoni M; Studer G; Smolinski A; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1378-1387. PubMed ID: 31571280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the quality of modelled 3D protein structures using the ModFOLD server.
    Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1137():83-103. PubMed ID: 24573476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of ligand binding site predictions in CASP10.
    Gallo Cassarino T; Bordoli L; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(0 2):154-63. PubMed ID: 24339001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting functional sites with an automated algorithm suitable for heterogeneous datasets.
    La D; Livesay DR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 6():116. PubMed ID: 15890082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How different are structurally flexible and rigid binding sites? Sequence and structural features discriminating proteins that do and do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding.
    Gunasekaran K; Nussinov R
    J Mol Biol; 2007 Jan; 365(1):257-73. PubMed ID: 17059826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A web server for analysis, comparison and prediction of protein ligand binding sites.
    Singh H; Srivastava HK; Raghava GP
    Biol Direct; 2016 Mar; 11(1):14. PubMed ID: 27016210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GalaxySite: ligand-binding-site prediction by using molecular docking.
    Heo L; Shin WH; Lee MS; Seok C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Jul; 42(Web Server issue):W210-4. PubMed ID: 24753427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PSSM-based prediction of DNA binding sites in proteins.
    Ahmad S; Sarai A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():33. PubMed ID: 15720719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fold independent structural comparisons of protein-ligand binding sites for exploring functional relationships.
    Gold ND; Jackson RM
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Feb; 355(5):1112-24. PubMed ID: 16359705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro, in silico and integrated strategies for the estimation of plasma protein binding. A review.
    Lambrinidis G; Vallianatou T; Tsantili-Kakoulidou A
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2015 Jun; 86():27-45. PubMed ID: 25819487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.