114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27094284)
21. Hydration properties of ligands and drugs in protein binding sites: tightly-bound, bridging water molecules and their effects and consequences on molecular design strategies.
García-Sosa AT
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1388-405. PubMed ID: 23662606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009.
Lensink MF; Wodak SJ
Proteins; 2010 Nov; 78(15):3073-84. PubMed ID: 20806235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. PDB-Ligand: a ligand database based on PDB for the automated and customized classification of ligand-binding structures.
Shin JM; Cho DH
Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jan; 33(Database issue):D238-41. PubMed ID: 15608186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. LigEvolutioner, a new strategy for modification and optimization of lead compounds in receptor/ligand complexes.
Zhou P; Tian F; Shang Z
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2008 Dec; 72(6):525-32. PubMed ID: 19090919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Domain-based small molecule binding site annotation.
Snyder KA; Feldman HJ; Dumontier M; Salama JJ; Hogue CW
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():152. PubMed ID: 16545112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Modeling peptide-protein interactions.
London N; Raveh B; Schueler-Furman O
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 857():375-98. PubMed ID: 22323231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predicting Ligand Binding Sites on Protein Surfaces by 3-Dimensional Probability Density Distributions of Interacting Atoms.
Jian JW; Elumalai P; Pitti T; Wu CY; Tsai KC; Chang JY; Peng HP; Yang AS
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160315. PubMed ID: 27513851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Polypharmacology rescored: protein-ligand interaction profiles for remote binding site similarity assessment.
Salentin S; Haupt VJ; Daminelli S; Schroeder M
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2014; 116(2-3):174-86. PubMed ID: 24923864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. SitesBase: a database for structure-based protein-ligand binding site comparisons.
Gold ND; Jackson RM
Nucleic Acids Res; 2006 Jan; 34(Database issue):D231-4. PubMed ID: 16381853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Structure-based prediction of protein-peptide specificity in Rosetta.
King CA; Bradley P
Proteins; 2010 Dec; 78(16):3437-49. PubMed ID: 20954182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
Brylinski M
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Toward the fast blind docking of a peptide to a target protein by using a four-body statistical pseudo-potential.
Aita T; Nishigaki K; Husimi Y
Comput Biol Chem; 2010 Feb; 34(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 19939735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Methods for predicting protein-ligand binding sites.
Xie ZR; Hwang MJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1215():383-98. PubMed ID: 25330972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking.
Brewerton SC
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 18428089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Combined use of physicochemical data and small-molecule crystallographic contact propensities to predict interactions in protein binding sites.
Nissink JW; Taylor R
Org Biomol Chem; 2004 Nov; 2(22):3238-49. PubMed ID: 15534701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How different are structurally flexible and rigid binding sites? Sequence and structural features discriminating proteins that do and do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding.
Gunasekaran K; Nussinov R
J Mol Biol; 2007 Jan; 365(1):257-73. PubMed ID: 17059826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. HingeProt: automated prediction of hinges in protein structures.
Emekli U; Schneidman-Duhovny D; Wolfson HJ; Nussinov R; Haliloglu T
Proteins; 2008 Mar; 70(4):1219-27. PubMed ID: 17847101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of two docking methods for peptide-protein interactions.
Yu Q; Wang F; Hu X; Xing G; Deng R; Guo J; Cheng A; Wang J; Hao J; Zhao D; Teng M; Zhang G
J Sci Food Agric; 2018 Aug; 98(10):3722-3727. PubMed ID: 29315602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Structural mining: self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential.
Liu Z; Dominy BN; Shakhnovich EI
J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jul; 126(27):8515-28. PubMed ID: 15238009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
