These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27095263)

  • 1. Tips and nodes are complementary not competing approaches to the calibration of molecular clocks.
    O'Reilly JE; Donoghue PC
    Biol Lett; 2016 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 27095263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dating Tips for Divergence-Time Estimation.
    O'Reilly JE; Dos Reis M; Donoghue PCJ
    Trends Genet; 2015 Nov; 31(11):637-650. PubMed ID: 26439502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evolution of methods for establishing evolutionary timescales.
    Donoghue PC; Yang Z
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2016 Jul; 371(1699):. PubMed ID: 27325838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of fossil tip-dating versus node-age calibrations in tetraodontiform fishes (Teleostei: Percomorphaceae).
    Arcila D; Alexander Pyron R; Tyler JC; Ortí G; Betancur-R R
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Jan; 82 Pt A():131-45. PubMed ID: 25462998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tectonic blocks and molecular clocks.
    De Baets K; Antonelli A; Donoghue PC
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2016 Jul; 371(1699):. PubMed ID: 27325840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of calibration and clock-model choice on molecular estimates of divergence times.
    Duchêne S; Lanfear R; Ho SY
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Sep; 78():277-89. PubMed ID: 24910154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of different strategies for using fossil calibrations to generate the time prior in Bayesian molecular clock dating.
    Barba-Montoya J; Dos Reis M; Yang Z
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2017 Sep; 114():386-400. PubMed ID: 28709986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing the impact of calibration on molecular divergence times using a fossil-rich group: the case of Nothofagus (Fagales).
    Sauquet H; Ho SY; Gandolfo MA; Jordan GJ; Wilf P; Cantrill DJ; Bayly MJ; Bromham L; Brown GK; Carpenter RJ; Lee DM; Murphy DJ; Sniderman JM; Udovicic F
    Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):289-313. PubMed ID: 22201158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consequences of Secondary Calibrations on Divergence Time Estimates.
    Schenk JJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0148228. PubMed ID: 26824760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Xenopus in Space and Time: Fossils, Node Calibrations, Tip-Dating, and Paleobiogeography.
    Cannatella D
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2015; 145(3-4):283-301. PubMed ID: 26279165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A total-evidence approach to dating with fossils, applied to the early radiation of the hymenoptera.
    Ronquist F; Klopfstein S; Vilhelmsen L; Schulmeister S; Murray DL; Rasnitsyn AP
    Syst Biol; 2012 Dec; 61(6):973-99. PubMed ID: 22723471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating fossil calibrations for dating phylogenies in light of rates of molecular evolution: a comparison of three approaches.
    Lukoschek V; Scott Keogh J; Avise JC
    Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):22-43. PubMed ID: 21840843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Simulation-Based Evaluation of Tip-Dating Under the Fossilized Birth-Death Process.
    Luo A; Duchêne DA; Zhang C; Zhu CD; Ho SYW
    Syst Biol; 2020 Mar; 69(2):325-344. PubMed ID: 31132125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data-driven speciation tree prior for better species divergence times in calibration-poor molecular phylogenies.
    Tao Q; Barba-Montoya J; Kumar S
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul; 37(Suppl_1):i102-i110. PubMed ID: 34252953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fossil calibrations and molecular divergence time estimates in centrarchid fishes (Teleostei: Centrarchidae).
    Near TJ; Bolnick DI; Wainwright PC
    Evolution; 2005 Aug; 59(8):1768-82. PubMed ID: 16329246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Insights from Empirical Analyses and Simulations on Using Multiple Fossil Calibrations with Relaxed Clocks to Estimate Divergence Times.
    Carruthers T; Scotland RW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2020 May; 37(5):1508-1529. PubMed ID: 31899514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calibration and error in placental molecular clocks: a conservative approach using the cetartiodactyl fossil record.
    van Tuinen M; Hadly EA
    J Hered; 2004; 95(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 15220386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for the quantitative comparison of molecular estimates of clade age and the fossil record.
    Clarke JA; Boyd CA
    Syst Biol; 2015 Jan; 64(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 25281846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biogeographic calibrations for the molecular clock.
    Ho SY; Tong KJ; Foster CS; Ritchie AM; Lo N; Crisp MD
    Biol Lett; 2015 Sep; 11(9):20150194. PubMed ID: 26333662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When did anoles diverge? An analysis of multiple dating strategies.
    Román-Palacios C; Tavera J; Castañeda MDR
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2018 Oct; 127():655-668. PubMed ID: 29906605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.