These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27095264)

  • 21. Efficacy in deceptive vocal exaggeration of human body size.
    Pisanski K; Reby D
    Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):968. PubMed ID: 33579910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acoustic analysis of four common voice diagnoses: moving toward disorder-specific assessment.
    Gillespie AI; Dastolfo C; Magid N; Gartner-Schmidt J
    J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 24880672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The voice-recognition accuracy of blind listeners.
    Bull R; Rathborn H; Clifford BR
    Perception; 1983; 12(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 6657428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Human Stress Detection: Cortisol Levels in Stressed Speakers Predict Voice-Based Judgments of Stress.
    Pisanski K; Sorokowski P
    Perception; 2021 Jan; 50(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 33302780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Discriminant capacity of acoustic, perceptual, and vocal self: the effects of vocal demands.
    Côrtes Gama AC; Camargo Z; Rocha Santos MA; Carlos Rusilo L
    J Voice; 2015 Mar; 29(2):260.e45-50. PubMed ID: 25499524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Auditory-tactile speech perception in congenitally blind and sighted adults.
    Sato M; Cavé C; Ménard L; Brasseur A
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3683-6. PubMed ID: 20736028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Human roars communicate upper-body strength more effectively than do screams or aggressive and distressed speech.
    Raine J; Pisanski K; Bond R; Simner J; Reby D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213034. PubMed ID: 30830931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transgender voice and communication treatment: a retrospective chart review of 25 cases.
    Hancock AB; Garabedian LM
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013 Jan; 48(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 23317384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The relationship between perception of vocal effort and relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset.
    Stepp CE; Sawin DE; Eadie TL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1887-96. PubMed ID: 22615477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intensive versus traditional voice therapy for vocal nodules: perceptual, physiological, acoustic and aerodynamic changes.
    Fu S; Theodoros DG; Ward EC
    J Voice; 2015 Mar; 29(2):260.e31-44. PubMed ID: 25311594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Production and perception of French vowels by congenitally blind adults and sighted adults.
    Ménard L; Dupont S; Baum SR; Aubin J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1406-14. PubMed ID: 19739754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Consistency of voice frequency and perturbation measures in children using cepstral analyses: a movement toward increased recording stability.
    Diercks GR; Ojha S; Infusino S; Maurer R; Hartnick CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug; 139(8):811-6. PubMed ID: 23949356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory spatial tuning in late-onset blindness in humans.
    Fieger A; Röder B; Teder-Sälejärvi W; Hillyard SA; Neville HJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 16494677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Voice recognition: effects of orienting task, and a test of blind versus sighted listeners.
    Winograd E; Kerr NH; Spence MJ
    Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 6721008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Chinchilla S; Galvin JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 15492884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Location of the auditory egocentre in the blind and normally sighted.
    Sukemiya H; Nakamizo S; Ono H
    Perception; 2008; 37(10):1587-95. PubMed ID: 19065860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of experience on perceptual spaces when judging synthesized voice quality: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Kisenwether JS; Prosek RA
    J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 24929934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Early non-visual experience influences proprioceptive-spatial discrimination acuity in adulthood.
    Fiehler K; Reuschel J; Rösler F
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):897-906. PubMed ID: 19159637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.