192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27095569)
1. An easy 'one tube' method to estimate viability of Cryptosporidium oocysts using real-time qPCR.
Paziewska-Harris A; Schoone G; Schallig HD
Parasitol Res; 2016 Jul; 115(7):2873-7. PubMed ID: 27095569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the viability of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts with the induction ratio of hsp70 mRNA production in manure.
Garcés-Sanchez G; Wilderer PA; Horn H; Munch JC; Lebuhn M
J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Sep; 94(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 23747597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of differences between DNA content of cell-cultured and freely suspended oocysts of Cryptosporidium parvum and their suitability as DNA standards in qPCR.
Woolsey ID; Blomstrand B; Øines Ø; Enemark HL
Parasit Vectors; 2019 Dec; 12(1):596. PubMed ID: 31856894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Glycosaminoglycans on
Mayerberger EA; Yazdanparast Tafti S; Jedlicka SS; Jellison KL
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2023 Mar; 89(3):e0173722. PubMed ID: 36790186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) assay targeting MIC1 for detection of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis oocysts.
Hønsvall BK; Robertson LJ
Exp Parasitol; 2017 Jan; 172():61-67. PubMed ID: 27998735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Specific and quantitative detection and identification of Cryptosporidium hominis and C. parvum in clinical and environmental samples.
Yang R; Murphy C; Song Y; Ng-Hublin J; Estcourt A; Hijjawi N; Chalmers R; Hadfield S; Bath A; Gordon C; Ryan U
Exp Parasitol; 2013 Sep; 135(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 23838581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of most probable number-PCR and most probable number-foci detection method for quantifying infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in environmental samples.
Carey CM; Lee H; Trevors JT
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Nov; 67(2):363-72. PubMed ID: 16730821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PCR and real time PCR for the detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst DNA.
Adamska M; Leońska-Duniec A; Maciejewska A; Sawczuk M; Skotarczak B
Folia Biol (Krakow); 2011; 59(3-4):115-20. PubMed ID: 22195463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-Term Storage of Cryptosporidium parvum for In Vitro Culture.
Paziewska-Harris A; Schoone G; Schallig HDFH
J Parasitol; 2018 Feb; 104(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 29095102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro excystation of Cryptosporidium muris oocysts and viability of released sporozoites in different incubation media.
Melicherová J; Mazourová V; Valigurová A
Parasitol Res; 2016 Mar; 115(3):1113-21. PubMed ID: 26678654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immunoassay for viable Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in turbid environmental water samples.
Call JL; Arrowood M; Xie LT; Hancock K; Tsang VC
J Parasitol; 2001 Feb; 87(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 11227892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proteomics analysis and protein expression during sporozoite excystation of Cryptosporidium parvum (Coccidia, Apicomplexa).
Snelling WJ; Lin Q; Moore JE; Millar BC; Tosini F; Pozio E; Dooley JS; Lowery CJ
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2007 Feb; 6(2):346-55. PubMed ID: 17124246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cryptosporidium parvum bovine genotype oocysts in the respiratory samples of an AIDS patient: efficacy of treatment with a combination of azithromycin and paromomycin.
Meamar AR; Rezaian M; Rezaie S; Mohraz M; Kia EB; Houpt ER; Solaymani-Mohammadi S
Parasitol Res; 2006 May; 98(6):593-5. PubMed ID: 16416289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical comparison of excystation methods in Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.
Pecková R; Stuart PD; Sak B; Květoňová D; Kváč M; Foitová I
Vet Parasitol; 2016 Oct; 230():1-5. PubMed ID: 27884435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Study of 18S rRNA and rDNA stability by real-time RT-PCR in heat-inactivated Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.
Fontaine M; Guillot E
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2003 Sep; 226(2):237-43. PubMed ID: 14553917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combination of cell culture and quantitative PCR (cc-qPCR) to assess disinfectants efficacy on Cryptosporidium oocysts under standardized conditions.
Shahiduzzaman M; Dyachenko V; Keidel J; Schmäschke R; Daugschies A
Vet Parasitol; 2010 Jan; 167(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 19850414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and application of an improved semiquantitative technique for detecting low-level Cryptosporidium parvum infections in mouse tissue using polymerase chain reaction.
Jenkins MC; Trout J; Fayer R
J Parasitol; 1998 Feb; 84(1):182-6. PubMed ID: 9488364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative polymerase chain (QPCR) reaction using the MIMIC approach to estimate Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts, an intestinal pathogen, in municipal water treatment sludge samples.
Udeh P; Veenstra J; Abraham AJ; John GH
Mol Cell Probes; 2000 Apr; 14(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 10799274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative sensitivity of PCR primer sets for detection of Cryptosporidium parvum.
Yu JR; Lee SU; Park WY
Korean J Parasitol; 2009 Sep; 47(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 19724705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigations of the relationship between use of in vitro cell culture-quantitative PCR and a mouse-based bioassay for evaluating critical factors affecting the disinfection performance of pulsed UV light for treating Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in saline.
Garvey M; Farrell H; Cormican M; Rowan N
J Microbiol Methods; 2010 Mar; 80(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 20096310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
