209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27096255)
1. Is cervical screening preventing adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix?
Castanon A; Landy R; Sasieni PD
Int J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 139(5):1040-5. PubMed ID: 27096255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening and adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Sasieni P; Castanon A; Cuzick J
Int J Cancer; 2009 Aug; 125(3):525-9. PubMed ID: 19449379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical screening and risk of adenosquamous and rare histological types of invasive cervical carcinoma: population based nested case-control study.
Lei J; Andrae B; Ploner A; Lagheden C; Eklund C; Nordqvist Kleppe S; Wang J; Fang F; Dillner J; Elfström KM; Sparén P
BMJ; 2019 Apr; 365():l1207. PubMed ID: 30944091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. False negative rate in mass screening for cervical cancer.
Sato S; Mikino H; Matsunaga G; Yajima A
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):836-7. PubMed ID: 9622728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Changing rates of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix in England.
Sasieni P; Adams J
Lancet; 2001 May; 357(9267):1490-3. PubMed ID: 11377601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of opportunistic screening on squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the cervix in Germany: A population-based case-control study.
Tanaka LF; Schriefer D; Radde K; Schauberger G; Klug SJ
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253801. PubMed ID: 34260601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical cytology reported as negative and risk of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: no strong evidence of benefit.
Mitchell H; Medley G; Gordon I; Giles G
Br J Cancer; 1995 Apr; 71(4):894-7. PubMed ID: 7710961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factors of cervical cancer after a negative cytological diagnosis in Polish cervical cancer screening programme.
Macios A; Didkowska J; Wojciechowska U; Komerska K; Glińska P; Kamiński MF; Nowakowski A
Cancer Med; 2021 May; 10(10):3449-3460. PubMed ID: 33934537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study.
de Sanjose S; Quint WG; Alemany L; Geraets DT; Klaustermeier JE; Lloveras B; Tous S; Felix A; Bravo LE; Shin HR; Vallejos CS; de Ruiz PA; Lima MA; Guimera N; Clavero O; Alejo M; Llombart-Bosch A; Cheng-Yang C; Tatti SA; Kasamatsu E; Iljazovic E; Odida M; Prado R; Seoud M; Grce M; Usubutun A; Jain A; Suarez GA; Lombardi LE; Banjo A; Menéndez C; Domingo EJ; Velasco J; Nessa A; Chichareon SC; Qiao YL; Lerma E; Garland SM; Sasagawa T; Ferrera A; Hammouda D; Mariani L; Pelayo A; Steiner I; Oliva E; Meijer CJ; Al-Jassar WF; Cruz E; Wright TC; Puras A; Llave CL; Tzardi M; Agorastos T; Garcia-Barriola V; Clavel C; Ordi J; Andújar M; Castellsagué X; Sánchez GI; Nowakowski AM; Bornstein J; Muñoz N; Bosch FX;
Lancet Oncol; 2010 Nov; 11(11):1048-56. PubMed ID: 20952254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stage at diagnosis and mortality in patients with adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix diagnosed as a consequence of cytologic screening.
Kinney W; Sawaya GF; Sung HY; Kearney KA; Miller M; Hiatt RA
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 12685183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Worldwide human papillomavirus etiology of cervical adenocarcinoma and its cofactors: implications for screening and prevention.
Castellsagué X; Díaz M; de Sanjosé S; Muñoz N; Herrero R; Franceschi S; Peeling RW; Ashley R; Smith JS; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; Bosch FX;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(5):303-15. PubMed ID: 16507827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice.
Katki HA; Kinney WK; Fetterman B; Lorey T; Poitras NE; Cheung L; Demuth F; Schiffman M; Wacholder S; Castle PE
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Jul; 12(7):663-72. PubMed ID: 21684207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Associations between smoking and adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix (United States).
Lacey JV; Frisch M; Brinton LA; Abbas FM; Barnes WA; Gravitt PE; Greenberg MD; Greene SM; Hadjimichael OC; McGowan L; Mortel R; Schwartz PE; Zaino RJ; Hildesheim A
Cancer Causes Control; 2001 Feb; 12(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 11246844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Invasive cervical cancer and screening: what are the rates of unscreened and underscreened women in the modern era?
Subramaniam A; Fauci JM; Schneider KE; Whitworth JM; Erickson BK; Kim K; Huh WK
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Apr; 15(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 21263352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Smoking and cervical cancer: pooled analysis of the IARC multi-centric case--control study.
Plummer M; Herrero R; Franceschi S; Meijer CJ; Snijders P; Bosch FX; de Sanjosé S; Muñoz N;
Cancer Causes Control; 2003 Nov; 14(9):805-14. PubMed ID: 14682438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human papillomavirus type-distribution in the cervix of Chinese women: a meta-analysis.
Bao YP; Li N; Smith JS; Qiao YL
Int J STD AIDS; 2008 Feb; 19(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 18334063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
