These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27096766)

  • 1. A UK medical devices regulator's perspective on registries.
    Wilkinson J; Crosbie A
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2016 Apr; 61(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 27096766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early experience of the European Medical Devices Vigilance System.
    Randall H
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Dec; 20(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 9503691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical device adverse incident reporting in interventional radiology.
    Parvizi N; Robertson I; McWilliams RG
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Mar; 69(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 24331767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New medical device regulations: the regulator's view.
    Melvin T; Torre M
    EFORT Open Rev; 2019 Jun; 4(6):351-356. PubMed ID: 31312522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing a Policy and Procedure Framework and Manual for a National Comprehensive Implantable Medical Device Registry in Saudi Arabia.
    Househ M; Alshagathrh F; Khalifa M; Al-Surimi K; Moll S; Alsaab Y; Alanazi A; Alhamad A; Baig MA; Afzal J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 251():215-218. PubMed ID: 29968641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Registries of implantable medical devices in Europe.
    Niederländer C; Wahlster P; Kriza C; Kolominsky-Rabas P
    Health Policy; 2013 Nov; 113(1-2):20-37. PubMed ID: 24075007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The dilemma of reporting device-related adverse events.
    Donawa M
    Med Device Technol; 2003; 14(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 12974122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological considerations in observational comparative effectiveness research for implantable medical devices: an epidemiologic perspective.
    Jalbert JJ; Ritchey ME; Mi X; Chen CY; Hammill BG; Curtis LH; Setoguchi S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 180(9):949-58. PubMed ID: 25255810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated surveillance to detect postprocedure safety signals of approved cardiovascular devices.
    Resnic FS; Gross TP; Marinac-Dabic D; Loyo-Berrios N; Donnelly S; Normand SL; Matheny ME
    JAMA; 2010 Nov; 304(18):2019-27. PubMed ID: 21063011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Designing and Developing a Multi-Center/Multi-Device National Registry for Implantable Medical Devices.
    Baig MA; Househ M; Shagathrh FA; Zahrani SA; Alanazi A; Saab YA; Afzal J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 251():219-222. PubMed ID: 29968642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kaiser Permanente implant registries benefit patient safety, quality improvement, cost-effectiveness.
    Paxton EW; Kiley ML; Love R; Barber TC; Funahashi TT; Inacio MC
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2013 Jun; 39(6):246-52. PubMed ID: 23789161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Building a cloud-based data sharing model for the Saudi national registry for implantable medical devices: Results of a readiness assessment.
    Alshagathrh F; Khan SA; Alothmany N; Al-Rawashdeh N; Househ M
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Oct; 118():113-119. PubMed ID: 30153916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Kaiser Permanente implant registries: effect on patient safety, quality improvement, cost effectiveness, and research opportunities.
    Paxton EW; Inacio MC; Kiley ML
    Perm J; 2012; 16(2):36-44. PubMed ID: 22745614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tracking and surveillance of patients with medical devices and implants.
    Morgan RW
    Med Device Technol; 1993; 4(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 10171686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Suggested Model for Building Robust Biomedical Implants Registries.
    Aloufi B; Alshagathrah F; Househ M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 238():173-176. PubMed ID: 28679916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation : Operational proposals for increasing the use of patient registries in regulatory assessments.
    McGettigan P; Alonso Olmo C; Plueschke K; Castillon M; Nogueras Zondag D; Bahri P; Kurz X; Mol PGM
    Drug Saf; 2019 Nov; 42(11):1343-1351. PubMed ID: 31302896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The medical device directives and their impact on the development and manufacturing of medical implants.
    Crisp S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1996; 210(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 9046183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety.
    Benn J; Koutantji M; Wallace L; Spurgeon P; Rejman M; Healey A; Vincent C
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2009 Feb; 18(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 19204126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The French Cochlear Implant Registry (EPIIC): Place and role of registries in post-registration studies of medical devices.
    Fraysse B; Thai Van H; Collignon C; Ruidavets B
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2020 Sep; 137 Suppl 1():S1-S3. PubMed ID: 32921590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Establishing a National Medical Device Registry in Saudi Arabia: Lessons Learned and Future Work.
    Al-Surimi K; Househ M; Almohandis E; Alshagathrh F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 213():23-6. PubMed ID: 26152943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.