128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27096855)
1. The role of P16ink4a and P53 immunostaining in predicting recurrence of HG-CIN after conization treatment.
Fonseca FV; Tomasich FD; Jung JE; Maestri CA; Carvalho NS
Rev Col Bras Cir; 2016 Feb; 43(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 27096855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of clinical evolution in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) treated by cervical conization.
Cardoso FA; Campaner AB; Silva MA
APMIS; 2014 Mar; 122(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 23763281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. p16(INK4A) expression is related to grade of cin and high-risk human papillomavirus but does not predict virus clearance after conization or disease outcome.
Branca M; Ciotti M; Santini D; Di Bonito L; Giorgi C; Benedetto A; Paba P; Favalli C; Costa S; Agarossi A; Alderisio M; Syrjänen K
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2004 Oct; 23(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 15381905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Programmed death-1 (PD-1) expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and its relationship with recurrence after conization.
Chang H; Hong JH; Lee JK; Cho HW; Ouh YT; Min KJ; So KA
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 May; 29(3):e27. PubMed ID: 29400020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic significance of high-risk HPV persistence after laser CO2 conization for high-grade CIN: a prospective clinical study.
Fallani MG; Penna C; Marchionni M; Bussani C; Pieralli A; Andersson KL; Fambrini M
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2008; 29(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 18714574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using biomarkers as objective standards in the diagnosis of cervical biopsies.
Galgano MT; Castle PE; Atkins KA; Brix WK; Nassau SR; Stoler MH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Aug; 34(8):1077-87. PubMed ID: 20661011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. p16INK4a immunohistochemistry improves interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Klaes R; Benner A; Friedrich T; Ridder R; Herrington S; Jenkins D; Kurman RJ; Schmidt D; Stoler M; von Knebel Doeberitz M
Am J Surg Pathol; 2002 Nov; 26(11):1389-99. PubMed ID: 12409715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [High-grade intraepithelial cervical lesions: evaluation of the factors determining an unfavorable outcome after conization].
Fonseca FV; Tomasich FD; Jung JE
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2011 Nov; 33(11):334-40. PubMed ID: 22267111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study.
Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Resection margins in conization as prognostic marker for relapse in high-grade dysplasia of the uterine cervix in northern Norway: a retrospective long-term follow-up material.
Ørbo A; Arnesen T; Arnes M; Straume B
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 May; 93(2):479-83. PubMed ID: 15099966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The expression of p16 (INK4a) and Ki-67 in relation to high-risk human papilloma viral load and residual disease after conization with positive margins.
Song SH; Park HM; Eom DW; Lee JK; Lee NW; Kim AR; Hur JY; Lee KW; Park YK; Saw HS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(4):858-67. PubMed ID: 17367326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased Ki-67 proliferative index and absence of P16INK4 in CIN-HPV related pathogenic pathways different from cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Kuo KT; Chang HC; Hsiao CH; Lin MC
Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 90(7):894-9. PubMed ID: 16540490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the p16 and Ki-67 Biomarkers as Predictors of the Recurrence of Premalignant Cervical Cancer Lesions after LEEP Conization.
Leite PMO; Tafuri L; Costa MZO; Lima MIM; Simões RT
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 39(6):288-293. PubMed ID: 28231598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immunohistochemical expression of p16, Ki-67 and p53 in cervical lesions - A systematic review.
Silva DC; Gonçalves AK; Cobucci RN; Mendonça RC; Lima PH; Cavalcanti G
Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Jul; 213(7):723-729. PubMed ID: 28554769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reevaluation of negative cervical conizations: Frequency, diagnostic errors, risk factors and management.
Lorenset LC; Percicote AP; Munhos SHO; Zanine RM
Pathol Res Pract; 2024 May; 257():155283. PubMed ID: 38614053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of p16INK4A and Hybrid Capture 2 human papillomavirus testing as adjunctive tests in liquid-based gynecologic SurePath preparations.
Nassar A; O'Reilly K; Cohen C; Siddiqui MT
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Mar; 36(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 18232003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of human papillomavirus status after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Huang HJ; Tung HJ; Yang LY; Chao A; Tang YH; Chou HH; Chang WY; Wu RC; Huang CC; Lin CY; Liao MJ; Chen WC; Lin CT; Chen MY; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Chang TC; Lai CH
Int J Cancer; 2021 Feb; 148(3):665-672. PubMed ID: 32781482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
