These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27096855)

  • 21. Investigating Diagnostic Problems of CIN1 and CIN2 Associated With High-risk HPV by Combining the Novel Molecular Biomarker PanHPVE4 With P16INK4a.
    van Baars R; Griffin H; Wu Z; Soneji YJ; van de Sandt M; Arora R; van der Marel J; Ter Harmsel B; Jach R; Okon K; Huras H; Jenkins D; Quint W; Doorbar J
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Nov; 39(11):1518-1528. PubMed ID: 26379150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
    Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The value of endocervical curettage after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Schneider P; von Orelli S; Roos M; Leo C; Fink D; Wyss P
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 16(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 22115536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The significance of HPV in the follow-up period after treatment for CIN.
    Gallwas J; Ditsch N; Hillemanns P; Friese K; Thaler C; Dannecker C
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2010; 31(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 20349777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of progression/regression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1.
    del Pino M; Garcia S; Fusté V; Alonso I; Fusté P; Torné A; Ordi J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):488.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19683687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dual immunostaining of cervical cytology specimens with atypical squamous cells for p16/Ki-67 does not exclude the existence of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Koo YJ; Hahn HS; Lee IH; Lim KT; Lee KH; Kim HS; Kim TJ; Chun YK; Kim HS; Hong SR
    Virchows Arch; 2013 Nov; 463(5):689-96. PubMed ID: 24081504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Decreased D2-40 and increased p16INK4A immunoreactivities correlate with higher grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Han H; Yang Y; Lu Z; He Q; Lin Z
    Diagn Pathol; 2011 Jul; 6():59. PubMed ID: 21729305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
    Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Utility of CK7 Versus p16 as a Prognostic Biomarker in CIN 2.
    Umphress B; Sanchez B; Paintal A; Nayar R; Maniar KP
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Apr; 42(4):479-484. PubMed ID: 29438168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The evaluation of p16INK4a immunoexpression/immunostaining and human papillomavirus DNA test in cervical liquid-based cytological samples.
    Nasioutziki M; Daniilidis A; Dinas K; Kyrgiou M; Valasoulis G; Loufopoulos PD; Paraskevaidis E; Loufopoulos A; Karakitsos P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Jan; 21(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 21330832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. PCR detection rates of high risk human papillomavirus DNA in paired self-collected urine and cervical scrapes after laser CO2 conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Fambrini M; Penna C; Pieralli A; Bussani C; Fallani MG; Andersson KL; Scarselli G; Marchionni M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18255129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. CO2 laser cylindrical excision or standard re-conization for persistent-recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-CIN) in women of fertile age.
    Fambrini M; Penna C; Pieralli A; Fallani MG; Andersson KL; Lozza V; Scarselli G; Marchionni M
    Anticancer Res; 2008; 28(6B):3871-5. PubMed ID: 19192643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficacy of p16 and ProExC immunostaining in the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical carcinoma.
    Guo M; Baruch AC; Silva EG; Jan YJ; Lin E; Sneige N; Deavers MT
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Feb; 135(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 21228361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Immunohistochemical expression of p16(INK4A) in normal uterine cervix, nonneoplastic epithelial lesions, and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Focchi GR; Silva ID; Nogueira-de-Souza NC; Dobo C; Oshima CT; Stavale JN
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Apr; 11(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 17415114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
    Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dual p16 and Ki-67 Expression in Liquid-Based Cervical Cytological Samples Compared to Pap Cytology Findings, Biopsies, and HPV Testing in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
    Prigenzi KCK; Heinke T; Salim RC; Focchi GRA
    Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(2):104-114. PubMed ID: 29566392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using p16 immunohistochemistry to classify morphologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2: correlation of ambiguous staining patterns with HPV subtypes and clinical outcome.
    Liu Y; Alqatari M; Sultan K; Ye F; Gao D; Sigel K; Zhang D; Kalir T
    Hum Pathol; 2017 Aug; 66():144-151. PubMed ID: 28705710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Post-cervical conization outcomes in patients with high-grade intraepithelial lesions.
    Simões RB; Campaner AB
    APMIS; 2013 Dec; 121(12):1153-61. PubMed ID: 23607318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The negative predictive value of p16INK4a to assess the outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 in the uterine cervix.
    Hariri J; Øster A
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2007 Jul; 26(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 17581402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors predicting human papillomavirus clearance in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesions treated by conization.
    Costa S; De Simone P; Venturoli S; Cricca M; Zerbini ML; Musiani M; Terzano P; Santini D; Cristiani P; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):358-65. PubMed ID: 12893200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.