These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27096960)

  • 21. Differential cerebral reactivity to shortest and longer tones: neuromagnetic and behavioral evidence.
    Cheng CH; Hsu WY; Shih YH; Lin HC; Liao KK; Wu ZA; Lin YY
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):260-70. PubMed ID: 20600746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Auditory scene analysis and sensory memory: the role of the auditory N100m.
    May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():19. PubMed ID: 16015713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Side of the stimulated ear influences the hemispheric balance in coding tonal stimuli.
    Yu HY; Chen JT; Wu ZA; Yeh TC; Ho LT; Lin YY
    Neurol Res; 2007 Jul; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17535555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contralateral white noise attenuates 40-Hz auditory steady-state fields but not N100m in auditory evoked fields.
    Kawase T; Maki A; Kanno A; Nakasato N; Sato M; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1037-42. PubMed ID: 21945467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cortical differentiation of speech and nonspeech sounds at 100 ms: implications for dyslexia.
    Parviainen T; Helenius P; Salmelin R
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jul; 15(7):1054-63. PubMed ID: 15563727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise.
    Miettinen I; Alku P; Salminen N; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():298-309. PubMed ID: 20969833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contra- and ipsilateral auditory stimuli produce different activation patterns at the human auditory cortex. A neuromagnetic study.
    Mäkelä JP
    Pflugers Arch; 1988 Jul; 412(1-2):12-6. PubMed ID: 3174374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Investigating temporal asymmetry using masking period patterns and models of peripheral auditory processing.
    Lentz JJ; Shen Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3194-205. PubMed ID: 21568421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Language related differences of the sustained response evoked by natural speech sounds.
    Fan CS; Zhu X; Dosch HG; von Stutterheim C; Rupp A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180441. PubMed ID: 28727776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Single-dipole analyses of the N100m are not suitable for characterizing the cortical representation of pitch.
    Lütkenhöner B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 12811003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electrophysiological and psychophysical asymmetries in sensitivity to interaural correlation steps.
    Lüddemann H; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):39-57. PubMed ID: 19555753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experience-dependent enhancement of pitch-specific responses in the auditory cortex is limited to acceleration rates in normal voice range.
    Krishnan A; Gandour JT; Suresh CH
    Neuroscience; 2015 Sep; 303():433-45. PubMed ID: 26166727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cortical Activation Patterns Evoked by Temporally Asymmetric Sounds and Their Modulation by Learning.
    Horikawa J; Ojima H
    eNeuro; 2017; 4(2):. PubMed ID: 28451640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neuromagnetic recordings reveal the temporal dynamics of auditory spatial processing in the human cortex.
    Tiitinen H; Salminen NH; Palomäki KJ; Mäkinen VT; Alku P; May PJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Mar; 396(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16343772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Different analysis of frequency and amplitude modulations of a continuous tone in the human auditory cortex: a neuromagnetic study.
    Mäkelä JP; Hari R; Linnankivi A
    Hear Res; 1987; 27(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 3610854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evidence of pitch processing in the N100m component of the auditory evoked field.
    Seither-Preisler A; Patterson R; Krumbholz K; Seither S; Lütkenhöner B
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):88-98. PubMed ID: 16464550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hemispheric asymmetry of the auditory evoked N100m response in relation to the crossing point between the central sulcus and Sylvian fissure.
    Ohtomo S; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Hatanaka K; Shirane R; Mizoi K; Yoshimoto T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Apr; 108(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 9607510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Age-related auditory deficits in temporal processing in F-344 rats.
    Parthasarathy A; Bartlett EL
    Neuroscience; 2011 Sep; 192():619-30. PubMed ID: 21723376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Asymmetry of temporal auditory T-complex: right ear-left hemisphere advantage in Tb timing in children.
    Bruneau N; Bidet-Caulet A; Roux S; Bonnet-Brilhault F; Gomot M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Feb; 95(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 25093904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.