166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27097629)
1. The Prognostic Value of Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients with Extraperitoneal Rectal Cancer.
Shin DW; Shin JY; Oh SJ; Park JK; Yu H; Ahn MS; Bae KB; Hong KH; Ji YI
Am Surg; 2016 Apr; 82(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 27097629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Circumferential margin involvement after total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer: are all R1 resections equal?
Beaufrère A; Guedj N; Maggiori L; Patroni A; Bedossa P; Panis Y
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Nov; 19(11):O377-O385. PubMed ID: 28941054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Raftopoulos I; Reed JF; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 21689315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
Dural AC; Keskin M; Balik E; Akici M; Kunduz E; Yamaner S; Asoglu O; Gulluoglu M; Bugra D
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Apr; 25(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 25159046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY study.
Taylor FG; Quirke P; Heald RJ; Moran BJ; Blomqvist L; Swift IR; Sebag-Montefiore D; Tekkis P; Brown G;
J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 24276776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors of circumferential resection margin involvement in the patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer.
Oh SJ; Shin JY
J Korean Surg Soc; 2012 Mar; 82(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 22403750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer in the era of total mesorectal excision: is there still a chance for cure?
Rahbari NN; Ulrich AB; Bruckner T; Münter M; Nickles A; Contin P; Löffler T; Reissfelder C; Koch M; Büchler MW; Weitz J
Ann Surg; 2011 Mar; 253(3):522-33. PubMed ID: 21209587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Standardized examination and research advancement of circumferential resection margin in patients with middle-lower rectal cancer].
Gu J; Wang L
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 14(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 21538262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term prognostic value of mesorectal grading after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.
Madbouly KM; Hussein AM; Abdelzaher E
Am J Surg; 2014 Sep; 208(3):332-41. PubMed ID: 24581995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variation in circumferential resection margin: Reporting and involvement in the South-Netherlands.
Homan J; Bökkerink GM; Aarts MJ; Lemmens VE; van Lijnschoten G; Rutten HJ; Wijsman JH; Nagtegaal ID; de Wilt JH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1485-92. PubMed ID: 26251342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in circumferential resection margin involvement after abdominoperineal excision and low anterior resection no longer significant.
van Leersum N; Martijnse I; den Dulk M; Kolfschoten N; Le Cessie S; van de Velde C; Tollenaar R; Wouters M; Rutten HJ
Ann Surg; 2014 Jun; 259(6):1150-5. PubMed ID: 24096756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: a comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes between extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal disease locations.
Kim SH; Park IJ; Joh YG; Hahn KY
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Jun; 51(6):844-51. PubMed ID: 18330644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer.
Bernstein TE; Endreseth BH; Romundstad P; Wibe A;
Br J Surg; 2009 Nov; 96(11):1348-57. PubMed ID: 19847867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lack of independent significance of a close (<1 mm) circumferential resection margin involvement in esophageal and junctional cancer.
O'Farrell NJ; Donohoe CL; Muldoon C; Costelloe JM; King S; Ravi N; Reynolds JV
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2727-33. PubMed ID: 23463085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer.
Patel A; Green N; Sarmah P; Langman G; Chandrakumaran K; Youssef H
Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Feb; 23(2):151-159. PubMed ID: 30783863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Circumferential resection margin involvement in stage III rectal cancer patients treated with curative resection followed by chemoradiotherapy: a surrogate marker for local recurrence?
Kang J; Kim H; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Sohn SK; Kim NK
Yonsei Med J; 2013 Jan; 54(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 23225809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of the prognostic factors for low rectal cancer with the pT1-2NxM0 stage after abdominoperineal resection.
Zhang XM; Ma C; Sun DY; Wang Z; Zhou ZX
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Jan; 27(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 25426977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the circumferential resection margin a predictor of local recurrence after preoperative radiotherapy and optimal surgery for rectal carcinoma?
Khani MH; Smedh K; Kraaz W
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Oct; 9(8):706-12. PubMed ID: 17535279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
