355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27097810)
1. The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.
Sluijter CE; van Lonkhuijzen LR; van Slooten HJ; Nagtegaal ID; Overbeek LI
Virchows Arch; 2016 Jun; 468(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 27097810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?
Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Functional Assessment of Synoptic Pathology Reporting for Ovarian Cancer.
Słodkowska J; Cierniak S; Patera J; Kopik J; Baranowski W; Markiewicz T; Murawski P; Buda I; Kozłowski W
Pathobiology; 2016; 83(2-3):70-8. PubMed ID: 27100104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of template-based synoptic reporting on completeness of surgical pathology reports.
Schaad N; Berezowska S; Perren A; Hewer E
Virchows Arch; 2024 Jan; 484(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 37017774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Synoptic reporting increases quality of upper gastrointestinal cancer pathology reports.
Baranov NS; Nagtegaal ID; van Grieken NCT; Verhoeven RHA; Voorham QJM; Rosman C; van der Post RS
Virchows Arch; 2019 Aug; 475(2):255-259. PubMed ID: 31144018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histopathology reporting of breast cancer in Queensland: the impact on the quality of reporting as a result of the introduction of recommendations.
Austin R; Thompson B; Coory M; Walpole E; Francis G; Fritschi L
Pathology; 2009; 41(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 19404849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathology reporting of breast cancer: trends in 1989-1999, following the introduction of mammographic screening in Western Australia.
Harvey JM; Sterrett GF; McEvoy S; Fritschi L; Jamrozik K; Ingram D; Joseph D; Dewar J; Byrne MJ;
Pathology; 2005 Oct; 37(5):341-6. PubMed ID: 16194843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implementation and use of electronic synoptic cancer reporting: an explorative case study of six Norwegian pathology laboratories.
Casati B; Haugland HK; Barstad GM; Bjugn R
Implement Sci; 2014 Aug; 9():111. PubMed ID: 25138817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of Breast Cancer Surgical Pathology Reports.
Vallacha A; Haider G; Raja W; Kumar D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Mar; 19(3):853-858. PubMed ID: 29582645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Uptake and impact of synoptic reporting in a community care setting.
Eng JL; Baliski CR; McGahan C; Cai E
Am J Surg; 2018 May; 215(5):857-861. PubMed ID: 29496204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Completeness of dictated operative reports in breast cancer--the case for synoptic reporting.
Donahoe L; Bennett S; Temple W; Hilchie-Pye A; Dabbs K; Macintosh E; Porter G
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 106(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 22234931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concordance with breast cancer pathology reporting practice guidelines.
Wilkinson NW; Shahryarinejad A; Winston JS; Watroba N; Edge SB
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jan; 196(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 12517547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pathological reporting of malignant colorectal polyps.
Gillespie C; Merrie A; Bissett I
N Z Med J; 2013 Sep; 126(1382):78-86. PubMed ID: 24154772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Synoptic Versus Narrative Reporting of Prostate Biopsies at a Tertiary Healthcare Institution: Challenges, successes and expectations.
Orah NO; Anunobi CC; Ojewola RW
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2017 Aug; 17(3):e319-e323. PubMed ID: 29062555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Synoptic reporting improves histopathological assessment of pancreatic resection specimens.
Gill AJ; Johns AL; Eckstein R; Samra JS; Kaufman A; Chang DK; Merrett ND; Cosman PH; Smith RC; Biankin AV; Kench JG;
Pathology; 2009 Feb; 41(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 19320058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structured pathology reporting improves the macroscopic assessment of rectal tumour resection specimens.
King S; Dimech M; Johnstone S
Pathology; 2016 Jun; 48(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 27114373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of a proforma improves colorectal cancer pathology reporting.
Rigby K; Brown SR; Lakin G; Balsitis M; Hosie KB
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Nov; 81(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 10655894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeat preoperative endoscopy after regional implementation of electronic synoptic endoscopy reporting: a retrospective comparative study.
Johnson GGRJ; Singh H; Vergis A; Park J; Hershorn O; Hochman D; Helewa RM
Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):2886-2895. PubMed ID: 34101014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving operative documentation in colorectal cancer surgery: synoptic notes pave the way forward.
Buchanan J; McCombie A; Connor S; Eglinton T
ANZ J Surg; 2022 Jul; 92(7-8):1754-1759. PubMed ID: 35347833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do surgeons convey all the details? A provincial assessment of operative reporting for breast cancer.
Liu C; Cheifetz R; Brown C; Nichol A; Speers C; Lohrisch C; McKevitt E
Am J Surg; 2020 May; 219(5):780-784. PubMed ID: 32145920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
