These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27097810)

  • 1. The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.
    Sluijter CE; van Lonkhuijzen LR; van Slooten HJ; Nagtegaal ID; Overbeek LI
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Jun; 468(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 27097810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?
    Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional Assessment of Synoptic Pathology Reporting for Ovarian Cancer.
    Słodkowska J; Cierniak S; Patera J; Kopik J; Baranowski W; Markiewicz T; Murawski P; Buda I; Kozłowski W
    Pathobiology; 2016; 83(2-3):70-8. PubMed ID: 27100104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of template-based synoptic reporting on completeness of surgical pathology reports.
    Schaad N; Berezowska S; Perren A; Hewer E
    Virchows Arch; 2024 Jan; 484(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 37017774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synoptic reporting increases quality of upper gastrointestinal cancer pathology reports.
    Baranov NS; Nagtegaal ID; van Grieken NCT; Verhoeven RHA; Voorham QJM; Rosman C; van der Post RS
    Virchows Arch; 2019 Aug; 475(2):255-259. PubMed ID: 31144018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histopathology reporting of breast cancer in Queensland: the impact on the quality of reporting as a result of the introduction of recommendations.
    Austin R; Thompson B; Coory M; Walpole E; Francis G; Fritschi L
    Pathology; 2009; 41(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 19404849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pathology reporting of breast cancer: trends in 1989-1999, following the introduction of mammographic screening in Western Australia.
    Harvey JM; Sterrett GF; McEvoy S; Fritschi L; Jamrozik K; Ingram D; Joseph D; Dewar J; Byrne MJ;
    Pathology; 2005 Oct; 37(5):341-6. PubMed ID: 16194843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation and use of electronic synoptic cancer reporting: an explorative case study of six Norwegian pathology laboratories.
    Casati B; Haugland HK; Barstad GM; Bjugn R
    Implement Sci; 2014 Aug; 9():111. PubMed ID: 25138817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of Breast Cancer Surgical Pathology Reports.
    Vallacha A; Haider G; Raja W; Kumar D
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Mar; 19(3):853-858. PubMed ID: 29582645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uptake and impact of synoptic reporting in a community care setting.
    Eng JL; Baliski CR; McGahan C; Cai E
    Am J Surg; 2018 May; 215(5):857-861. PubMed ID: 29496204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Completeness of dictated operative reports in breast cancer--the case for synoptic reporting.
    Donahoe L; Bennett S; Temple W; Hilchie-Pye A; Dabbs K; Macintosh E; Porter G
    J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 106(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 22234931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concordance with breast cancer pathology reporting practice guidelines.
    Wilkinson NW; Shahryarinejad A; Winston JS; Watroba N; Edge SB
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jan; 196(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 12517547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pathological reporting of malignant colorectal polyps.
    Gillespie C; Merrie A; Bissett I
    N Z Med J; 2013 Sep; 126(1382):78-86. PubMed ID: 24154772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Synoptic Versus Narrative Reporting of Prostate Biopsies at a Tertiary Healthcare Institution: Challenges, successes and expectations.
    Orah NO; Anunobi CC; Ojewola RW
    Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2017 Aug; 17(3):e319-e323. PubMed ID: 29062555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Synoptic reporting improves histopathological assessment of pancreatic resection specimens.
    Gill AJ; Johns AL; Eckstein R; Samra JS; Kaufman A; Chang DK; Merrett ND; Cosman PH; Smith RC; Biankin AV; Kench JG;
    Pathology; 2009 Feb; 41(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 19320058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structured pathology reporting improves the macroscopic assessment of rectal tumour resection specimens.
    King S; Dimech M; Johnstone S
    Pathology; 2016 Jun; 48(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 27114373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of a proforma improves colorectal cancer pathology reporting.
    Rigby K; Brown SR; Lakin G; Balsitis M; Hosie KB
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Nov; 81(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 10655894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeat preoperative endoscopy after regional implementation of electronic synoptic endoscopy reporting: a retrospective comparative study.
    Johnson GGRJ; Singh H; Vergis A; Park J; Hershorn O; Hochman D; Helewa RM
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):2886-2895. PubMed ID: 34101014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving operative documentation in colorectal cancer surgery: synoptic notes pave the way forward.
    Buchanan J; McCombie A; Connor S; Eglinton T
    ANZ J Surg; 2022 Jul; 92(7-8):1754-1759. PubMed ID: 35347833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do surgeons convey all the details? A provincial assessment of operative reporting for breast cancer.
    Liu C; Cheifetz R; Brown C; Nichol A; Speers C; Lohrisch C; McKevitt E
    Am J Surg; 2020 May; 219(5):780-784. PubMed ID: 32145920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.