These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27097854)
1. Clinical Pulpotomy Trial of Copaifera Langsdorffii Oil Resin Versus Formocresol and White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Primary Teeth. Musale PK; Soni AS Pediatr Dent; 2016; 38(2):5-12. PubMed ID: 27097854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Light-cured calcium hydroxide vs formocresol in human primary molar pulpotomies: a randomized controlled trial. Zurn D; Seale NS Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 18402097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy on vital primary teeth: a clinical and radiographic study. Olatosi OO; Sote EO; Orenuga OO Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 25666010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sodium hypochlorite vs formocresol as pulpotomy medicaments in primary molars: 1-year follow-up. Shabzendedar M; Mazhari F; Alami M; Talebi M Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 23930631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars. Noorollahian H Br Dent J; 2008 Jun; 204(11):E20. PubMed ID: 18425074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and radiographic comparison of biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulpotomy agents in primary molars. Juneja P; Kulkarni S Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2017 Aug; 18(4):271-278. PubMed ID: 28780718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth. Agamy HA; Bakry NS; Mounir MM; Avery DR Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 15344622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Formocresol, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Portland Cement, and Enamel Matrix Derivative in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: A Two Year Follow-Up. Yildirim C; Basak F; Akgun OM; Polat GG; Altun C J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 26696101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy of primary teeth: a 2-year follow-up. Ansari G; Ranjpour M Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 20518934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Partial Pulpotomy Versus Formocresol Pulpotomy: A Randomized, Split-Mouth, Controlled Clinical Trial with 24 Months Follow-Up. Nematollahi H; Noorollahian H; Bagherian A; Yarbakht M; Nematollahi S Pediatr Dent; 2018 May; 40(3):184-189. PubMed ID: 29793564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report. Eidelman E; Holan G; Fuks AB Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 11242724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and radiographic success of mineral trioxide aggregate compared with formocresol as a pulpotomy treatment in primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Marghalani AA; Omar S; Chen JW J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Jul; 145(7):714-21. PubMed ID: 24982277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate as pulpotomy agents in deciduous teeth. Srinivasan D; Jayanthi M Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 22048576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between biodentine and formocresol for pulpotomy of primary teeth: A randomized clinical trial. El Meligy OA; Allazzam S; Alamoudi NM Quintessence Int; 2016; 47(7):571-80. PubMed ID: 27175451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of a novel alternative to conventional formocresol-zinc oxide eugenol pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpally involved human primary teeth: diode laser-mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy. Saltzman B; Sigal M; Clokie C; Rukavina J; Titley K; Kulkarni GV Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Nov; 15(6):437-47. PubMed ID: 16238654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation and Comparison between Formocresol and Sodium Hypochlorite as Pulpotomy Medicament: A Randomized Study. Chauhan SP; Gupta M; Ahmed H; Tongya R; Sharma D; Chugh B J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Nov; 18(11):1029-1033. PubMed ID: 29109316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and Radiographic Success of Low-Level Laser Therapy Compared with Formocresol Pulpotomy Treatment in Primary Molars. Alamoudi N; Nadhreen A; Sabbagh H; El Meligy O; Al Tuwirqi A; Elkhodary H Pediatr Dent; 2020 Sep; 42(5):359-366. PubMed ID: 33087220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Short-term treatment outcome of pulpotomies in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine: a randomized clinical trial. Cuadros-Fernández C; Lorente Rodríguez AI; Sáez-Martínez S; García-Binimelis J; About I; Mercadé M Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1639-45. PubMed ID: 26578117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation and comparison of white mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol medicaments in primary tooth pulpotomy: clinical and radiographic study. Jayam C; Mitra M; Mishra J; Bhattacharya B; Jana B J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 24531596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. Ruby JD; Cox CF; Mitchell SC; Makhija S; Chompu-Inwai P; Jackson J Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 22502601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]