194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27097884)
1. Measurement variability of quantitative sensory testing in persons with post-stroke shoulder pain.
Lindgren I; Ekstrand E; Brogårdh C
J Rehabil Med; 2016 Apr; 48(5):435-41. PubMed ID: 27097884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Somatosensory impairments are common after stroke but have only a small impact on post-stroke shoulder pain.
Lindgren I; Ekstrand E; Lexell J; Westergren H; Brogårdh C
J Rehabil Med; 2014 Apr; 46(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 24419000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multifactorial assessment of measurement errors affecting intraoral quantitative sensory testing reliability.
Moana-Filho EJ; Alonso AA; Kapos FP; Leon-Salazar V; Durand SH; Hodges JS; Nixdorf DR
Scand J Pain; 2017 Jul; 16():93-98. PubMed ID: 28850419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Test-retest agreement and reliability of quantitative sensory testing 1 year after breast cancer surgery.
Andersen KG; Kehlet H; Aasvang EK
Clin J Pain; 2015 May; 31(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 25084072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Replicate effects and test-retest reliability of quantitative sensory threshold testing in dogs with and without chronic pain.
Knazovicky D; Helgeson ES; Case B; Thomson A; Gruen ME; Maixner W; Lascelles BDX
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2017 May; 44(3):615-624. PubMed ID: 28528759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Thermal quantitative sensory testing to predict postoperative pain outcomes following gynecologic surgery.
Ahmad S; De Oliveira GS; Bialek JM; McCarthy RJ
Pain Med; 2014 May; 15(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 24517836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Test-retest reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing on two sites within the L5 dermatome of the lumbar spine and lower extremity.
Knutti IA; Suter MR; Opsommer E
Neurosci Lett; 2014 Sep; 579():157-62. PubMed ID: 25064700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concurrent validity of a low-cost and time-efficient clinical sensory test battery to evaluate somatosensory dysfunction.
Zhu GC; Böttger K; Slater H; Cook C; Farrell SF; Hailey L; Tampin B; Schmid AB
Eur J Pain; 2019 Nov; 23(10):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 31325385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials.
Rolke R; Magerl W; Campbell KA; Schalber C; Caspari S; Birklein F; Treede RD
Eur J Pain; 2006 Jan; 10(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 16291301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of quantitative sensory testing applied to musculoskeletal orofacial region: Site and sex differences.
Costa YM; de Araújo-Júnior ENS; Fiedler LS; de Souza PRJ; Silva LLCP; Ferreira DMAO; Conti PCR; Bonjardim LR
Eur J Pain; 2019 Jan; 23(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 29989267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The long-term reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in healthy individuals.
Marcuzzi A; Wrigley PJ; Dean CM; Adams R; Hush JM
Pain; 2017 Jul; 158(7):1217-1223. PubMed ID: 28328574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility and influence of test modality order on thermal perception and thermal pain thresholds in quantitative sensory testing.
Heldestad V; Linder J; Sellersjö L; Nordh E
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 121(11):1878-85. PubMed ID: 20478739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing: a systematic review.
Moloney NA; Hall TM; Doody CM
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):191-207. PubMed ID: 22773522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classifying post-stroke shoulder pain: can the DN4 be helpful?
Roosink M; van Dongen RT; Renzenbrink GJ; Ijzerman MJ
Eur J Pain; 2011 Jan; 15(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 20547465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative sensory testing in cluster headache: increased sensory thresholds.
Ladda J; Straube A; Förderreuther S; Krause P; Eggert T
Cephalalgia; 2006 Sep; 26(9):1043-50. PubMed ID: 16919054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pain ratings at the thresholds are necessary for interpretation of quantitative sensory testing.
Kelly KG; Cook T; Backonja MM
Muscle Nerve; 2005 Aug; 32(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 15937874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hypnotic relaxation results in elevated thresholds of sensory detection but not of pain detection.
Kramer S; Zims R; Simang M; Rüger L; Irnich D
BMC Complement Altern Med; 2014 Dec; 14():496. PubMed ID: 25511129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical and clinical performance of the thermo-test device "Q-Sense" to assess small fibre function: A head-to-head comparison with the "Thermal Sensory Analyzer" TSA in diabetic patients and healthy volunteers.
Pfau DB; Greffrath W; Schilder A; Magerl W; Ohler C; Westermann A; Maier C; Doppler K; Sommer C; Orth M; Hammes HP; Kurz J; Götz M; Treede RD; Schuh-Hofer S
Eur J Pain; 2019 Nov; 23(10):1863-1878. PubMed ID: 31359547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and validity of quantitative sensory testing in persons with spinal cord injury and neuropathic pain.
Felix ER; Widerström-Noga EG
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 19533521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of unpleasant and pain thresholds of thermal stimuli in the orofacial regions: a psychophysical study using quantitative sensory testing in healthy young men.
Kim HK; Kim ME
Somatosens Mot Res; 2018 Jun; 35(2):139-147. PubMed ID: 30107761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
