These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27098143)

  • 1. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Surgical Staging of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer: The STELLA Trial.
    Díaz-Feijoo B; Correa-Paris A; Pérez-Benavente A; Franco-Camps S; Sánchez-Iglesias JL; Cabrera S; de la Torre J; Centeno C; Puig OP; Gil-Ibañez B; Colas E; Magrina J; Gil-Moreno A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2966-74. PubMed ID: 27098143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical complications comparing extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic staging in early stage ovarian and endometrial cancer.
    Díaz-Feijoo B; Bebia V; Hernández A; Gilabert-Estalles J; Franco-Camps S; de la Torre J; Segrist J; Chipirliu A; Cabrera S; Pérez-Benavente A; Gil-Moreno A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 160(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 33160695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma.
    Pakish J; Soliman PT; Frumovitz M; Westin SN; Schmeler KM; Reis RD; Munsell MF; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Feb; 132(2):366-71. PubMed ID: 24361579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Infrarenal lymphadenectomy for gynecological malignancies: two laparoscopic approaches.
    O'Hanlan KA; Sten MS; O'Holleran MS; Ford NN; Struck DM; McCutcheon SP
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 139(2):330-7. PubMed ID: 26407477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
    Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Mar; 44(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 29239059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients.
    Hudry D; Ahmad S; Zanagnolo V; Narducci F; Fastrez M; Ponce J; Tucher E; Lécuru F; Conri V; Leguevaque P; Goffin F; Holloway RW; Lambaudie E;
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Mar; 25(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 25628104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy by Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy.
    da Costa AG; Borghesi Y; Hudry D; Faes J; Bresson L; Narducci F; Leblanc E
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):861-866. PubMed ID: 29337211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL).
    Coronado PJ; Fasero M; Magrina JF; Herraiz MA; Vidart JA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):674-81. PubMed ID: 24486680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robot-assisted Extraperitoneal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy Is Associated with Fewer Surgical Complications: A Post Hoc Analysis of the STELLA-2 Randomized Trial.
    Bebia V; Gil-Moreno A; Hernández A; Gilabert-Estellés J; Franco-Camps S; de la Torre J; Siegrist J; Chipirliu A; Cabrera S; Bradbury M; Pérez-Benavente A; Díaz-Feijoo B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 28(12):2004-2012.e1. PubMed ID: 34022445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extraperitoneal laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial carcinoma staging: an approach with higher efficiency.
    Zhang W; Xia L; Han X; Ju X; Wu X; Chen X
    World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 19(1):323. PubMed ID: 34743715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single-port laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy as part of staging operation for early ovarian cancer and high grade endometrial cancer.
    Lee YS
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 May; 27(3):e32. PubMed ID: 27029753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.
    Akand M; Erdogru T; Avci E; Ates M
    Int J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):916-21. PubMed ID: 26212891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning curve of laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma: A cumulative sum analysis.
    Yoshida H; Yamamoto M; Shigeta H
    Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 35():254-260. PubMed ID: 32932223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical development and results of left extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer.
    Dargent D; Ansquer Y; Mathevet P
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 77(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 10739695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transperitoneal
    Prodromidou A; Machairas N; Spartalis E; Kostakis ID; Iavazzo C; Moris D; Tsilimigras DI; Athanasiou A; Nikiteas N
    Anticancer Res; 2018 Aug; 38(8):4677-4681. PubMed ID: 30061235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy.
    Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Ibáñez B; Pérez-Benavente A; Martínez-Gómez X; Colás E; Sánchez-Iglesias JL; Cabrera-Díaz S; Puig-Puig O; Magrina JF; Gil-Moreno A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 24231134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: randomized experimental study].
    Occelli B; Narducci F; Lanvin D; Coste E; Legoupils E; Castelain B; Querleu D
    Ann Chir; 2000 Jan; 125(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 10921179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies.
    Akladios C; Ronzino V; Schrot-Sanyan S; Afors K; Fernandes R; Baldauf JJ; Wattiez A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):268-74. PubMed ID: 25460316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy.
    Nagao S; Fujiwara K; Kagawa R; Kozuka Y; Oda T; Maehata K; Ishikawa H; Koike H; Kohno I
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):732-5. PubMed ID: 16808966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.