43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27098143)
21. Surgical complications comparing extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic staging in early stage ovarian and endometrial cancer.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Bebia V; Hernández A; Gilabert-Estalles J; Franco-Camps S; de la Torre J; Segrist J; Chipirliu A; Cabrera S; Pérez-Benavente A; Gil-Moreno A
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 160(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 33160695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Pakish J; Soliman PT; Frumovitz M; Westin SN; Schmeler KM; Reis RD; Munsell MF; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Feb; 132(2):366-71. PubMed ID: 24361579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Infrarenal lymphadenectomy for gynecological malignancies: two laparoscopic approaches.
O'Hanlan KA; Sten MS; O'Holleran MS; Ford NN; Struck DM; McCutcheon SP
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 139(2):330-7. PubMed ID: 26407477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Mar; 44(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 29239059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients.
Hudry D; Ahmad S; Zanagnolo V; Narducci F; Fastrez M; Ponce J; Tucher E; Lécuru F; Conri V; Leguevaque P; Goffin F; Holloway RW; Lambaudie E;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Mar; 25(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 25628104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy: experience with 150 patients and review of the literature.
Possover M; Krause N; Plaul K; Kühne-Heid R; Schneider A
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Oct; 71(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 9784314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Review of Laparoscopic Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy for Early-stage Endometrial Cancer: Extraperitoneal Approach May Have the Advantage over Intraperitoneal Approach.
Imai K; Hirooka-Nakama J; Hotta Y; Shigeta H
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2024; 13(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 38487605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robotic paraaortic lymphadenectomy in oncogynecology. Double side docking of daVinci S system increases the success rates of high paraaortic lymph node dissection in endometrial cancer.
Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Hambálek J; Maděrka M; Jančeková V; Kolářová V; Langová K; Pilka R
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 31213052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Laparoscopic staging pelvic lymphadenectomy: extraperitoneal approach.
Das S
Semin Surg Oncol; 1996; 12(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 8685579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of laparoscopy in staging of different gynaecological cancers.
Tse KY; Ngan HY
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):884-95. PubMed ID: 25819676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer staging: A meta-analysis.
Chen SH; Li ZA; Huang R; Xue HQ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 55(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 27590368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology.
Wisner KP; Gupta S; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):782-9. PubMed ID: 26288990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Extraperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Cancer Staging: Current Evidence.
Bogani G; Ditto A; Martinelli F; Signorelli M; Chiappa V; Sabatucci I; Scaffa C; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 26802906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping in gynecologic oncology.
Wisner KPA; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Nov; 45():83-93. PubMed ID: 28533155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laparoscopic technique of para-aortic lymph node dissection: A comparison of the different approaches to trans- versus extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy.
Kusunoki S; Huang KG; Magno A; Lee CL
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2017; 6(2):51-57. PubMed ID: 30254875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Randomized controlled trial versus comparative cohort study in verifying the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.
Todo Y; Sakuragi N
Int J Clin Oncol; 2013 Apr; 18(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 23203151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Surgical Staging of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer: The STELLA Trial.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Correa-Paris A; Pérez-Benavente A; Franco-Camps S; Sánchez-Iglesias JL; Cabrera S; de la Torre J; Centeno C; Puig OP; Gil-Ibañez B; Colas E; Magrina J; Gil-Moreno A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2966-74. PubMed ID: 27098143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in gynaecological neoplasms: comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal lymphadenectomy.
Iavazzo C; Gkegkes ID
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 293(1):11-28. PubMed ID: 26188777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
